RE: PowerPack 1.1.0 (RB 1.7.27) questions

2015-02-19 Thread Dunnigan, Terrence J
2. Thanks! Great to hear.
3. One of my use cases would be to generate metrics for all reviews on my 
server. We don’t use review groups at all. Since our Review Board server is 
only used by my coworkers, I’d be content with a “select all” type of option 
for the reports. It might be useful for me to be able to select one, many, or 
all repositories for the reports as well.
4. PIL-1.1.7-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg is installed in the python 2.6 site 
packages directory. I believe that it was installed as part of installing 
Review Board. (When I launch python on the server as myself, I can import the 
Image module without errors.)

Thanks,

Terry

From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of David Trowbridge
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 7:14 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: PowerPack 1.1.0 (RB 1.7.27) questions

Terry,

Answers below. Just a note that we're also happy to answer Power Pack questions 
at supp...@beanbaginc.commailto:supp...@beanbaginc.com




2)  Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively? Instead 
of having to convert to PDF?

Yes! This is something we've been investigating for a while, and hopefully 
we'll have an answer soon.





3)  When generating reports, Is there a way to specify “all” or a “group” 
of people? This would be very helpful for generating organizational Time to 
First and Time to Close reports.

Right now, this is oriented towards the use of review groups (via the to 
groups field). We have plans to improve the selection abilities of reports in 
a future release--if there are specific ways that you'd like to be able to 
choose data, we'd love to hear it.





4)  When I attach a PDF, I don’t see a thumbnail of the file. Instead, all 
I see is a triange with an exclamation mark. The server log has a number of 
these messages:



- PDF Review UI: Could not convert thumbnailData to stored image for file 
attachment comment 200: decoder zip not available

Failed to convert data uri to image: decoder zip not available.

None - terrence.j.dunnigan - 
/reviews/api/review-requests/2707/file-attachments/754/ - Failed to store 
thumbnail for attachment 754: decoder zip not available



This looks like there's a problem with your PIL or Pillow library. Can you 
check to see whether it's PIL or Pillow that's installed, and confirm for me 
how it was installed?





5)  The server log is also logging errors (dozens of errors daily)  for all 
other peer reviews with file attachments:

Unable to load review UI for Test Plan.docx: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document 
Test Plan.docx because of incorrect extension

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/ui/base.py,
 line 222, in for_type

return handler(attachment.get_review_request(), attachment)

  File build/bdist.macosx-10.10-intel/egg/rbpowerpack/pdf/reviewui.py, line 
32, in __init__

Exception: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document Test Plan.docx because of incorrect 
extension

That is quite noisy! I'll see what I can do to improve this.


6)  Just a general observation when viewing PDFs – clicking on the title of 
the PDF opens the PDF itself whereas clicking on the thumbnail opens the review 
interface. That surprised me. Also, when you are in the review interface, it’s 
not clear how to get back to the review itself. I wish the GUI had a back 
button or something. (Perhaps this is improved in RB 2.x?)
This is indeed improved a bit in 2.x (where you'll see the usual View Diff / 
View Reviews links at the top). The file attachment boxes and the links 
therein are still a bit wonky, but we hope to improve this soon.



Thanks for the feedback! If you have any additional questions, please don't 
hesitate to reply either here or at 
supp...@beanbaginc.commailto:supp...@beanbaginc.com

-David



On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 2:39:45 PM Dunnigan, Terrence J 
terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.commailto:terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com wrote:
Hi all,

I’ve downloaded and installed Review Board Power Pack 1.1.0 in my Review Board 
1.7.27 server, and started playing with it. I have a few questions/observations.


1)  I like the PDF support! Very cool. Drawing a box around the area is 
rather effective for highlighting certain areas.

2)  Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively? Instead 
of having to convert to PDF?

3)  When generating reports, Is there a way to specify “all” or a “group” 
of people? This would be very helpful for generating organizational Time to 
First and Time to Close reports.

4)  When I attach a PDF, I don’t see a thumbnail of the file. Instead, all 
I see is a triange with an exclamation mark. The server log has a number of 
these messages:



- PDF Review UI: Could not convert thumbnailData to stored image for file 
attachment comment 200: decoder zip not available

Failed to convert data uri to image: decoder zip

Re: PowerPack 1.1.0 (RB 1.7.27) questions

2015-02-17 Thread David Trowbridge
Terry,

Answers below. Just a note that we're also happy to answer Power Pack
questions at supp...@beanbaginc.com



2)  Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively?
Instead of having to convert to PDF?

Yes! This is something we've been investigating for a while, and hopefully
we'll have an answer soon.



3)  When generating reports, Is there a way to specify “all” or a
“group” of people? This would be very helpful for generating organizational
Time to First and Time to Close reports.

Right now, this is oriented towards the use of review groups (via the to
groups field). We have plans to improve the selection abilities of reports
in a future release--if there are specific ways that you'd like to be able
to choose data, we'd love to hear it.



4)  When I attach a PDF, I don’t see a thumbnail of the file. Instead,
all I see is a triange with an exclamation mark. The server log has a
number of these messages:



- PDF Review UI: Could not convert thumbnailData to stored image for
file attachment comment 200: decoder zip not available

Failed to convert data uri to image: decoder zip not available.

None - terrence.j.dunnigan -
/reviews/api/review-requests/2707/file-attachments/754/ - Failed to
store thumbnail for attachment 754: decoder zip not available


This looks like there's a problem with your PIL or Pillow library. Can
you check to see whether it's PIL or Pillow that's installed, and
confirm for me how it was installed?



5)  The server log is also logging errors (dozens of errors daily)
 for all other peer reviews with file attachments:

Unable to load review UI for Test Plan.docx: PDFReviewUI: rejecting
document Test Plan.docx because of incorrect extension

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/ui/base.py,
line 222, in for_type

return handler(attachment.get_review_request(), attachment)

  File build/bdist.macosx-10.10-intel/egg/rbpowerpack/pdf/reviewui.py,
line 32, in __init__

Exception: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document Test Plan.docx because of
incorrect extension


That is quite noisy! I'll see what I can do to improve this.



6)  Just a general observation when viewing PDFs – clicking on the
title of the PDF opens the PDF itself whereas clicking on the thumbnail
opens the review interface. That surprised me. Also, when you are in the
review interface, it’s not clear how to get back to the review itself. I
wish the GUI had a back button or something. (Perhaps this is improved in
RB 2.x?)
This is indeed improved a bit in 2.x (where you'll see the usual View
Diff / View Reviews links at the top). The file attachment boxes and the
links therein are still a bit wonky, but we hope to improve this soon.



Thanks for the feedback! If you have any additional questions, please don't
hesitate to reply either here or at supp...@beanbaginc.com

-David



On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 2:39:45 PM Dunnigan, Terrence J 
terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com wrote:

  Hi all,



 I’ve downloaded and installed Review Board Power Pack 1.1.0 in my Review
 Board 1.7.27 server, and started playing with it. I have a few
 questions/observations.



 1)  I like the PDF support! Very cool. Drawing a box around the area
 is rather effective for highlighting certain areas.

 2)  Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively?
 Instead of having to convert to PDF?

 3)  When generating reports, Is there a way to specify “all” or a
 “group” of people? This would be very helpful for generating organizational
 Time to First and Time to Close reports.

 4)  When I attach a PDF, I don’t see a thumbnail of the file.
 Instead, all I see is a triange with an exclamation mark. The server log
 has a number of these messages:



 - PDF Review UI: Could not convert thumbnailData to stored image for file 
 attachment comment 200: decoder zip not available

 Failed to convert data uri to image: decoder zip not available.

 None - terrence.j.dunnigan - 
 /reviews/api/review-requests/2707/file-attachments/754/ - Failed to store 
 thumbnail for attachment 754: decoder zip not available



 5)  The server log is also logging errors (dozens of errors daily)  for 
 all other peer reviews with file attachments:



 Unable to load review UI for Test Plan.docx: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document 
 Test Plan.docx because of incorrect extension

 Traceback (most recent call last):

   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/ui/base.py,
  line 222, in for_type

 return handler(attachment.get_review_request(), attachment)

   File build/bdist.macosx-10.10-intel/egg/rbpowerpack/pdf/reviewui.py, line 
 32, in __init__

 Exception: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document Test Plan.docx because of 
 incorrect extension



 6)  Just a general observation when viewing PDFs – clicking on the title 
 of the PDF opens the PDF itself whereas clicking on the 

PowerPack 1.1.0 (RB 1.7.27) questions

2015-02-17 Thread Dunnigan, Terrence J
Hi all,

I've downloaded and installed Review Board Power Pack 1.1.0 in my Review Board 
1.7.27 server, and started playing with it. I have a few questions/observations.


1)  I like the PDF support! Very cool. Drawing a box around the area is 
rather effective for highlighting certain areas.

2)  Are there any plans to support MS Office file formats natively? Instead 
of having to convert to PDF?

3)  When generating reports, Is there a way to specify all or a group 
of people? This would be very helpful for generating organizational Time to 
First and Time to Close reports.

4)  When I attach a PDF, I don't see a thumbnail of the file. Instead, all 
I see is a triange with an exclamation mark. The server log has a number of 
these messages:



- PDF Review UI: Could not convert thumbnailData to stored image for file 
attachment comment 200: decoder zip not available

Failed to convert data uri to image: decoder zip not available.

None - terrence.j.dunnigan - 
/reviews/api/review-requests/2707/file-attachments/754/ - Failed to store 
thumbnail for attachment 754: decoder zip not available



5)  The server log is also logging errors (dozens of errors daily)  for all 
other peer reviews with file attachments:



Unable to load review UI for Test Plan.docx: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document 
Test Plan.docx because of incorrect extension

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.27-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/ui/base.py,
 line 222, in for_type

return handler(attachment.get_review_request(), attachment)

  File build/bdist.macosx-10.10-intel/egg/rbpowerpack/pdf/reviewui.py, line 
32, in __init__

Exception: PDFReviewUI: rejecting document Test Plan.docx because of incorrect 
extension


6)  Just a general observation when viewing PDFs - clicking on the title of 
the PDF opens the PDF itself whereas clicking on the thumbnail opens the review 
interface. That surprised me. Also, when you are in the review interface, it's 
not clear how to get back to the review itself. I wish the GUI had a back 
button or something. (Perhaps this is improved in RB 2.x?)


Thanks,

Terry

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.