Re: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2015-01-16 Thread David Trowbridge
It doesn't right now. Would you mind filing an enhancement request in the issue tracker? -David On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 7:40:46 AM Justin Palmer justinpalme...@gmail.com wrote: Rally isn’t in the intitial batch I'm a fan of JIRA, but my company uses Rally. Does or will Review Board support

Re: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2015-01-16 Thread Justin Palmer
I submitted Issue *3724* http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3724. On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 1:55:15 PM UTC-6, David Trowbridge wrote: It doesn't right now. Would you mind filing an enhancement request in the issue tracker? -David On Thu Jan 15 2015 at 7:40:46 AM

Re: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2015-01-15 Thread Justin Palmer
Rally isn’t in the intitial batch I'm a fan of JIRA, but my company uses Rally. Does or will Review Board support Rally? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyral https://help.rallydev.com/access-web-services-api-wsapi Thanks, Justin On Monday, February 10, 2014 at 3:26:32 PM UTC-6, Javins, Walt

Re: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2014-02-11 Thread Gong Zhang
Hi Tomi, Our team is using ReviewBoard + Jira + Jenkins right now, and although we can link the Jira ticket to a code review manually, it will be great if the review board can automatically create a Jira ticket for us when we submit a code review and automatically close that ticket once the

Re: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2014-02-11 Thread markdbeyer
I have integrated RB with our bug tracker, a heavily customized version of GNATS. I modified the RBBugTracker extension published by a student, I believe, a few years back. That extension was built for google code, though the extension has a plug-in architecture so I added one for GNATS. It

RE: Ideas needed regarding to RB bug tracker integration

2014-02-10 Thread Javins, Walt
Hi Tomi, We use the Review Board + Bugzilla power combo here at Isilon, and would definitely benefit from better integration between the two services. The bug links in RB are a great start, but as you’ve mentioned, there isn’t much discoverability from the standpoint of “I’m looking at a bug,