Re: Performance Issues (Was Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4)
Sorry for the late response. I missed this reply. For Apache settings the worker and prefork configurations are the exact same between the two vms: # prefork MPM # StartServers: number of server processes to start # MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare # MaxSpareServers: maximum number of server processes which are kept spare # ServerLimit: maximum value for MaxClients for the lifetime of the server # MaxClients: maximum number of server processes allowed to start # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule prefork.c StartServers 8 MinSpareServers5 MaxSpareServers 20 ServerLimit 256 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 /IfModule # worker MPM # StartServers: initial number of server processes to start # MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections # MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare # MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare # ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server process # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule worker.c StartServers 2 MaxClients 150 MinSpareThreads 25 MaxSpareThreads 75 ThreadsPerChild 25 MaxRequestsPerChild 0 /IfModule *Symptoms from our old production vm:* Previously, only about 2-3 times a day at random times, we would get a build of Apache processes that would hit the server at the same time, which results in the load average on top going up to 100-200 in the worse case scenario. During this time, any operations done in the website are extremely slow and often times users will report not receiving an email after a publish. Since then, we've increased the sendmail Queue and Refuse limits from their default values of (12 and 15) to (20 and 150) respectively. The stats on this vm were: - 10 GB RAM - 23 GB Swap - 4 Cores - RHEL 5.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) - Server version: Apache/2.2.3 *Symptoms on our new production vm:* We moved the production to RHEL6.4 as recommended by our IT team and have since been noticing that we we get these stalled processes more often and users tend to notice the performance hits much more. Another odd thing that we noticed from our performance monitoring tool Zenoss is that the IO spikes on writes every 5 minutes, which was on the case previously (screenshots attached). The stats on this vm were: - 16 GB RAM - 4 GB Swap - 4 Cores - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) - Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) We're trying a lot of different things on our end, but if you have any ideas or if anyone has seen this issue, it would help. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-L5GVIinnSbo/UxpXxkdzJDI/Ckg/Aq9DYWW6AXs/s1600/Screen+Shot+2014-03-07+at+3.35.13+PM.png https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-7FD3HifikjY/UxpXjy3QUwI/CkY/BFO-tGDUwoE/s1600/Screen+Shot+2014-03-07+at+3.33.09+PM.png Ze On Thursday, March 6, 2014 8:21:00 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Okay, well, I was hoping it'd be simple :) Can you give me some examples of operations that are very slow, and operations that remain fast? Or does everything basically slow to a grind? How do the Apache settings (worker vs prefork, and their config) compare between installs? Christian On Thursday, March 6, 2014, Ze Xiao ilackno...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, memcached is running. Here is what I see from the Admin Server Cache page I've got it running on two different vms, which I've obfuscated as VM1 and VM2 SERVER CACHE Cache backend: django.core.cache.backends.memcached.CacheClass vm1 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 61079 of 257077 Cache hits: 5289571 of 5458860: 96% Cache misses: 169289 of 5458860: 3% Cache evictions: 139881 Cache traffic: 10.2 GB in, 27.9 GB out Uptime: 3683047 seconds vm2 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 54978 of 401980 Cache hits: 5999634 of 6277198: 95% Cache misses: 277564 of 6277198: 4% Cache evictions: 307751 Cache traffic: 16.8 GB in, 26.2 GB out Uptime: 938019 seconds On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Ze, Those warnings are probably unrelated. I want to get a better sense of the performance problems. First thing I want to check is that your server is properly accessing and using memcached. If you log into the admin UI, do you see any stats on memcached, and any keys stored in the cache? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Ze Lin Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, We're facing some pretty bad performance issues on our production system after we moved our application to a different
Re: Performance Issues (Was Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4)
Hi Ze, The spikes every 5 minutes are interesting. Sounds like a cronjob or something, perhaps? Are you using search indexing? What are you using for the database? Remind me what version of RB you guys are using? - Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Ze Lin Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.comwrote: Sorry for the late response. I missed this reply. For Apache settings the worker and prefork configurations are the exact same between the two vms: # prefork MPM # StartServers: number of server processes to start # MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare # MaxSpareServers: maximum number of server processes which are kept spare # ServerLimit: maximum value for MaxClients for the lifetime of the server # MaxClients: maximum number of server processes allowed to start # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule prefork.c StartServers 8 MinSpareServers5 MaxSpareServers 20 ServerLimit 256 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 /IfModule # worker MPM # StartServers: initial number of server processes to start # MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections # MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare # MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare # ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server process # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule worker.c StartServers 2 MaxClients 150 MinSpareThreads 25 MaxSpareThreads 75 ThreadsPerChild 25 MaxRequestsPerChild 0 /IfModule *Symptoms from our old production vm:* Previously, only about 2-3 times a day at random times, we would get a build of Apache processes that would hit the server at the same time, which results in the load average on top going up to 100-200 in the worse case scenario. During this time, any operations done in the website are extremely slow and often times users will report not receiving an email after a publish. Since then, we've increased the sendmail Queue and Refuse limits from their default values of (12 and 15) to (20 and 150) respectively. The stats on this vm were: - 10 GB RAM - 23 GB Swap - 4 Cores - RHEL 5.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) - Server version: Apache/2.2.3 *Symptoms on our new production vm:* We moved the production to RHEL6.4 as recommended by our IT team and have since been noticing that we we get these stalled processes more often and users tend to notice the performance hits much more. Another odd thing that we noticed from our performance monitoring tool Zenoss is that the IO spikes on writes every 5 minutes, which was on the case previously (screenshots attached). The stats on this vm were: - 16 GB RAM - 4 GB Swap - 4 Cores - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) - Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) We're trying a lot of different things on our end, but if you have any ideas or if anyone has seen this issue, it would help. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-L5GVIinnSbo/UxpXxkdzJDI/Ckg/Aq9DYWW6AXs/s1600/Screen+Shot+2014-03-07+at+3.35.13+PM.png https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-7FD3HifikjY/UxpXjy3QUwI/CkY/BFO-tGDUwoE/s1600/Screen+Shot+2014-03-07+at+3.33.09+PM.png Ze On Thursday, March 6, 2014 8:21:00 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Okay, well, I was hoping it'd be simple :) Can you give me some examples of operations that are very slow, and operations that remain fast? Or does everything basically slow to a grind? How do the Apache settings (worker vs prefork, and their config) compare between installs? Christian On Thursday, March 6, 2014, Ze Xiao ilackno...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, memcached is running. Here is what I see from the Admin Server Cache page I've got it running on two different vms, which I've obfuscated as VM1 and VM2 SERVER CACHE Cache backend: django.core.cache.backends.memcached.CacheClass vm1 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 61079 of 257077 Cache hits: 5289571 of 5458860: 96% Cache misses: 169289 of 5458860: 3% Cache evictions: 139881 Cache traffic: 10.2 GB in, 27.9 GB out Uptime: 3683047 seconds vm2 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 54978 of 401980 Cache hits: 5999634 of 6277198: 95% Cache misses: 277564 of 6277198: 4% Cache evictions: 307751 Cache traffic: 16.8 GB in, 26.2 GB out Uptime: 938019 seconds On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Ze, Those warnings are probably unrelated. I want to get a better sense of the performance problems. First thing I want to check is that your server is properly accessing and using
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Hi Christian, We're facing some pretty bad performance issues on our production system after we moved our application to a different vm with RHEL6.4. We notice that our performance issues occur especially when the log shows this: [Fri Mar 07 00:18:19 2014] [error] /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. However, it is important to note that we've seen these warning issues for the last 1.5 years, so I doubt it has to do with it. Nonetheless, do you know what specific operations one could do to trigger this warning? I'm trying to see if I can reproduce the performance spikes. Thanks, Ze On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:22:49 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Chuck, Sorry for failing to respond to the previous e-mail. Missed it. I haven't seen that particular warning before. It'll probably have a log entry any time pycrypto is imported. What distro/version are you using? Sounds like maybe it's an older one? You may need to hand-upgrade libgmp, I'm not sure. From your previous e-mail: Doing a site backup never hurts, but generally isn't important. Review Board won't delete any files. At most, it'd add some new directories and tell you to change permissions, but I don't think we've done that since 1.5. We have provided instructions on other sorts of manual updates that need to be made, though. We don't have any documentation right now on p4python's SSL support. This is only needed if you're using SSL-backed Perforce repositories. It's unfortunately not something we can automate well right now, but essentially, you'd have to install OpenSSL 1.0.1 on your distro and install its development package (I don't know if newer versions work -- hopefully other 1.0.x releases do). You'd then need to manually compile/install p4python. Yes, it's a pain, but it's something Perforce will need to make easier for us. From the e-mail you just posted while I was replying to this, you'd need to check the reviewboard.log file and see what error it's reporting before I can say what happened. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:10 AM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chi...@chipx86.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - a href=http://www.vmware.com/; target=_ ... -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Performance Issues (Was Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4)
Hi Ze, Those warnings are probably unrelated. I want to get a better sense of the performance problems. First thing I want to check is that your server is properly accessing and using memcached. If you log into the admin UI, do you see any stats on memcached, and any keys stored in the cache? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Ze Lin Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, We're facing some pretty bad performance issues on our production system after we moved our application to a different vm with RHEL6.4. We notice that our performance issues occur especially when the log shows this: [Fri Mar 07 00:18:19 2014] [error] /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. However, it is important to note that we've seen these warning issues for the last 1.5 years, so I doubt it has to do with it. Nonetheless, do you know what specific operations one could do to trigger this warning? I'm trying to see if I can reproduce the performance spikes. Thanks, Ze On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:22:49 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Chuck, Sorry for failing to respond to the previous e-mail. Missed it. I haven't seen that particular warning before. It'll probably have a log entry any time pycrypto is imported. What distro/version are you using? Sounds like maybe it's an older one? You may need to hand-upgrade libgmp, I'm not sure. From your previous e-mail: Doing a site backup never hurts, but generally isn't important. Review Board won't delete any files. At most, it'd add some new directories and tell you to change permissions, but I don't think we've done that since 1.5. We have provided instructions on other sorts of manual updates that need to be made, though. We don't have any documentation right now on p4python's SSL support. This is only needed if you're using SSL-backed Perforce repositories. It's unfortunately not something we can automate well right now, but essentially, you'd have to install OpenSSL 1.0.1 on your distro and install its development package (I don't know if newer versions work -- hopefully other 1.0.x releases do). You'd then need to manually compile/install p4python. Yes, it's a pain, but it's something Perforce will need to make easier for us. From the e-mail you just posted while I was replying to this, you'd need to check the reviewboard.log file and see what error it's reporting before I can say what happened. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:10 AM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7- linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chi...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a
Re: Performance Issues (Was Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4)
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, memcached is running. Here is what I see from the Admin Server Cache page I've got it running on two different vms, which I've obfuscated as VM1 and VM2 SERVER CACHE Cache backend: django.core.cache.backends.memcached.CacheClass vm1 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 61079 of 257077 Cache hits: 5289571 of 5458860: 96% Cache misses: 169289 of 5458860: 3% Cache evictions: 139881 Cache traffic: 10.2 GB in, 27.9 GB out Uptime: 3683047 seconds vm2 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 54978 of 401980 Cache hits: 5999634 of 6277198: 95% Cache misses: 277564 of 6277198: 4% Cache evictions: 307751 Cache traffic: 16.8 GB in, 26.2 GB out Uptime: 938019 seconds On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Ze, Those warnings are probably unrelated. I want to get a better sense of the performance problems. First thing I want to check is that your server is properly accessing and using memcached. If you log into the admin UI, do you see any stats on memcached, and any keys stored in the cache? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Ze Lin Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, We're facing some pretty bad performance issues on our production system after we moved our application to a different vm with RHEL6.4. We notice that our performance issues occur especially when the log shows this: [Fri Mar 07 00:18:19 2014] [error] /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. However, it is important to note that we've seen these warning issues for the last 1.5 years, so I doubt it has to do with it. Nonetheless, do you know what specific operations one could do to trigger this warning? I'm trying to see if I can reproduce the performance spikes. Thanks, Ze On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:22:49 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Chuck, Sorry for failing to respond to the previous e-mail. Missed it. I haven't seen that particular warning before. It'll probably have a log entry any time pycrypto is imported. What distro/version are you using? Sounds like maybe it's an older one? You may need to hand-upgrade libgmp, I'm not sure. From your previous e-mail: Doing a site backup never hurts, but generally isn't important. Review Board won't delete any files. At most, it'd add some new directories and tell you to change permissions, but I don't think we've done that since 1.5. We have provided instructions on other sorts of manual updates that need to be made, though. We don't have any documentation right now on p4python's SSL support. This is only needed if you're using SSL-backed Perforce repositories. It's unfortunately not something we can automate well right now, but essentially, you'd have to install OpenSSL 1.0.1 on your distro and install its development package (I don't know if newer versions work -- hopefully other 1.0.x releases do). You'd then need to manually compile/install p4python. Yes, it's a pain, but it's something Perforce will need to make easier for us. From the e-mail you just posted while I was replying to this, you'd need to check the reviewboard.log file and see what error it's reporting before I can say what happened. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:10 AM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7- linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned
Re: Performance Issues (Was Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4)
Okay, well, I was hoping it'd be simple :) Can you give me some examples of operations that are very slow, and operations that remain fast? Or does everything basically slow to a grind? How do the Apache settings (worker vs prefork, and their config) compare between installs? Christian On Thursday, March 6, 2014, Ze Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, memcached is running. Here is what I see from the Admin Server Cache page I've got it running on two different vms, which I've obfuscated as VM1 and VM2 SERVER CACHE Cache backend: django.core.cache.backends.memcached.CacheClass vm1 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 61079 of 257077 Cache hits: 5289571 of 5458860: 96% Cache misses: 169289 of 5458860: 3% Cache evictions: 139881 Cache traffic: 10.2 GB in, 27.9 GB out Uptime: 3683047 seconds vm2 Memory usage: 1.8 GB Keys in cache: 54978 of 401980 Cache hits: 5999634 of 6277198: 95% Cache misses: 277564 of 6277198: 4% Cache evictions: 307751 Cache traffic: 16.8 GB in, 26.2 GB out Uptime: 938019 seconds On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Ze, Those warnings are probably unrelated. I want to get a better sense of the performance problems. First thing I want to check is that your server is properly accessing and using memcached. If you log into the admin UI, do you see any stats on memcached, and any keys stored in the cache? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Ze Lin Xiao ilacknormal...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, We're facing some pretty bad performance issues on our production system after we moved our application to a different vm with RHEL6.4. We notice that our performance issues occur especially when the log shows this: [Fri Mar 07 00:18:19 2014] [error] /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. However, it is important to note that we've seen these warning issues for the last 1.5 years, so I doubt it has to do with it. Nonetheless, do you know what specific operations one could do to trigger this warning? I'm trying to see if I can reproduce the performance spikes. Thanks, Ze On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:22:49 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Chuck, Sorry for failing to respond to the previous e-mail. Missed it. I haven't seen that particular warning before. It'll probably have a log entry any time pycrypto is imported. What distro/version are you using? Sounds like maybe it's an older one? You may need to hand-upgrade libgmp, I'm not sure. From your previous e-mail: Doing a site backup never hurts, but generally isn't important. Review Board won't delete any files. At most, it'd add some new directories and tell you to change permissions, but I don't think we've done that since 1.5. We have provided instructions on other sorts of manual updates that need to be made, though. We don't have any documentation right now on p4python's SSL support. This is only needed if you're using SSL-backed Perforce repositories. It's unfortunately not something we can automate well right now, but essentially, you'd have to install OpenSSL 1.0.1 on your distro and install its development package (I don't know if newer versions work -- hopefully other 1.0.x releases do). You'd then need to manually compile/install p4python. Yes, it's a pain, but it's something Perforce will need to make easier for us. From the e-mail you just posted while I was replying to this, you'd need to check the reviewboard.log file and see what error it's reporting before I can say what happened. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:10 AM, chuck j cjerr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site- -- Ze Lin Xiao -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, There has been lots of improvement done on RB server from version 1.6.1 till date, hence i would like to know if the upgrade from 1.6.1 to latest version is supported? If not then how should I bring my RB server 1.6.1 to latest state without loosing the existing data from my existing database. We need to upgrade because 1.7.2 has SSL feature implement and we have planned to upgrade perforce server to 2012.2. Please help. Appreciated your response and help Cheers, Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
While sent an email to you, I face one issue. When i clicked to any of the old review request i see error message: Something broke! (Error 500) It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either a bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please report this to your administrator. What is this weird messagehas upgrade went fine? Thanks, - Chuck On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:40 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, There has been lots of improvement done on RB server from version 1.6.1 till date, hence i would like to know if the upgrade from 1.6.1 to latest version is supported? If not then how should I bring my RB server 1.6.1 to latest state without loosing the existing data from my existing database. We need to upgrade because 1.7.2 has SSL feature implement and we have planned to upgrade perforce server to 2012.2. Please help. Appreciated your response and help Cheers, Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Hi Chuck, Sorry for failing to respond to the previous e-mail. Missed it. I haven't seen that particular warning before. It'll probably have a log entry any time pycrypto is imported. What distro/version are you using? Sounds like maybe it's an older one? You may need to hand-upgrade libgmp, I'm not sure. From your previous e-mail: Doing a site backup never hurts, but generally isn't important. Review Board won't delete any files. At most, it'd add some new directories and tell you to change permissions, but I don't think we've done that since 1.5. We have provided instructions on other sorts of manual updates that need to be made, though. We don't have any documentation right now on p4python's SSL support. This is only needed if you're using SSL-backed Perforce repositories. It's unfortunately not something we can automate well right now, but essentially, you'd have to install OpenSSL 1.0.1 on your distro and install its development package (I don't know if newer versions work -- hopefully other 1.0.x releases do). You'd then need to manually compile/install p4python. Yes, it's a pain, but it's something Perforce will need to make easier for us. From the e-mail you just posted while I was replying to this, you'd need to check the reviewboard.log file and see what error it's reporting before I can say what happened. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:10 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I would like to thank you for your response about upgrade. I went through with your comments and i was able to bring my server to 1.7.4. Also also want to bring to your notice regarding below warning i got after while upgrading my site. /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. How to resolve this? Do i need to build it libgmp again as message shows, will it make RB server report more issues. Thanks, -Chuck On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:58 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, There has been lots of improvement done on RB server from version 1.6.1 till date, hence i would like to know if the upgrade from 1.6.1 to latest version is supported? If not then how should I bring my RB server 1.6.1 to latest state without loosing the existing data from my existing database. We need to upgrade because 1.7.2 has SSL feature implement and we have planned to upgrade perforce server to 2012.2. Please help. Appreciated your response and help Cheers, Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Here are the logs
its seems it searching for lessc executable.
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://scrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/?view=to-me
Django Version: 1.4.3
Python Version: 2.7.2
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'django.contrib.staticfiles',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.extensions',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.gravatars',
'djblets.log',
'djblets.pipeline',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'pipeline',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.attachments',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.extensions',
'reviewboard.hostingsvcs',
'reviewboard.notifications',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.reviews.ui',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.site',
'reviewboard.ssh',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
['django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.InitReviewBoardMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'django.contrib.messages.middleware.MessageMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.extensions.middleware.ExtensionsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.accounts.middleware.TimezoneMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.X509AuthMiddleware',
'reviewboard.site.middleware.LocalSiteMiddleware']
Template error:
In template
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/templates/base.html,
error at line 39
/usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
29 : },
30 : {% if not user.is_anonymous %}
31 : gUserName = {{user.username}},
32 : gUserFullName = {{user|user_displayname}},
33 : {% endif %}
34 : gUserAuthenticated = {{user.is_authenticated|lower}};
35 : {% block jsconsts %}{% endblock %}
36 : /script
37 : link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href={% static
rb/images/favicon.ico %} /
38 : link rel=apple-touch-icon-precomposed type=image/png
href={% static rb/images/apple-home-icon.png %} /
39 : {% compressed_css common %}
40 : {% block css %}{% endblock %}
41 : {% template_hook_point base-css %}
42 : !--[if lt IE 7.]
43 : style type=text/css
44 : body {
45 : behavior: url({% static lib/js/csshover2.htc %});
46 : }
47 :
48 : img,
49 : table.sidebyside .commentflag,
Traceback:
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py
in get_response
111. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/auth/util.py
in _checklogin
47. return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py
in _check_valid_prefs
52. return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py
in dashboard
854. 'sidebar_hooks': DashboardHook.hooks,
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/datagrid/grids.py
in render_to_response
777.
context))
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/shortcuts/__init__.py
in render_to_response
20. return HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args, **kwargs),
**httpresponse_kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/loader.py
in render_to_string
171. return t.render(Context(dictionary))
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py
in render
140. return self._render(context)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py
in _render
134. return self.nodelist.render(context)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py
in render
823. bit = self.render_node(node, context)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/debug.py
in render_node
74. return node.render(context)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/template/loader_tags.py
in render
123.
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Yep, it's looking for lessc, which it shouldn't be. That means it's not finding
the generated static media files, probably. Or some other strange configuration
problem. Probably an installation problem.
To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran
'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site', correct?
If you did do the rb-site upgrade when you installed 1.7.4, then can you show
me what's in your $sitedir/htdocs/static/rb/css/ and
$sitedir/htdocs/static/djblets/css/ directories?
What version of what distro are you using?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:34 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the logs
its seems it searching for lessc executable.
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://scrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/?view=to-me
Django Version: 1.4.3
Python Version: 2.7.2
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'django.contrib.staticfiles',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.extensions',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.gravatars',
'djblets.log',
'djblets.pipeline',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'pipeline',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.attachments',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.extensions',
'reviewboard.hostingsvcs',
'reviewboard.notifications',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.reviews.ui',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.site',
'reviewboard.ssh',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
['django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.InitReviewBoardMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'django.contrib.messages.middleware.MessageMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.extensions.middleware.ExtensionsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.accounts.middleware.TimezoneMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.X509AuthMiddleware',
'reviewboard.site.middleware.LocalSiteMiddleware']
Template error:
In template
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/templates/base.html,
error at line 39
/usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
29 : },
30 : {% if not user.is_anonymous %}
31 : gUserName = {{user.username}},
32 : gUserFullName = {{user|user_displayname}},
33 : {% endif %}
34 : gUserAuthenticated = {{user.is_authenticated|lower}};
35 : {% block jsconsts %}{% endblock %}
36 : /script
37 : link rel=shortcut icon type=image/x-icon href={% static
rb/images/favicon.ico %} /
38 : link rel=apple-touch-icon-precomposed type=image/png href={%
static rb/images/apple-home-icon.png %} /
39 : {% compressed_css common %}
40 : {% block css %}{% endblock %}
41 : {% template_hook_point base-css %}
42 : !--[if lt IE 7.]
43 : style type=text/css
44 : body {
45 : behavior: url({% static lib/js/csshover2.htc %});
46 : }
47 :
48 : img,
49 : table.sidebyside .commentflag,
Traceback:
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py
in get_response
111. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/auth/util.py
in _checklogin
47. return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py
in _check_valid_prefs
52. return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py
in dashboard
854. 'sidebar_hooks': DashboardHook.hooks,
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/datagrid/grids.py
in render_to_response
777.
context))
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.3-py2.7.egg/django/shortcuts/__init__.py
in
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- I am using linux: 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@svrrb1 rb]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb [root@svrrb1 rb]# ls -l total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 css drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 images drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 js [root@svrrb1 static]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static [root@svrrb1 static]# ls -lrt total 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 95 Feb 5 23:18 rb - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 96 Feb 5 23:18 lib - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 77 Feb 5 23:18 djblets - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/static lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 98 Feb 5 23:18 admin - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin What to do !! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Yep, it's looking for lessc, which it shouldn't be. That means it's not finding the generated static media files, probably. Or some other strange configuration problem. Probably an installation problem. To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site', correct? If you did do the rb-site upgrade when you installed 1.7.4, then can you show me what's in your $sitedir/htdocs/static/rb/css/ and $sitedir/htdocs/static/djblets/css/ directories? What version of what distro are you using? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Here are the logs its seems it searching for lessc executable. Environment: Request Method: GET Request URL: http://scrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/?view=to-me Django Version: 1.4.3 Python Version: 2.7.2 Installed Applications: ['django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.markup', 'django.contrib.sites', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.staticfiles', 'djblets.datagrid', 'djblets.extensions', 'djblets.feedview', 'djblets.gravatars', 'djblets.log', 'djblets.pipeline', 'djblets.siteconfig', 'djblets.util', 'djblets.webapi', 'pipeline', 'reviewboard.accounts', 'reviewboard.admin', 'reviewboard.attachments', 'reviewboard.changedescs', 'reviewboard.diffviewer', 'reviewboard.extensions', 'reviewboard.hostingsvcs', 'reviewboard.notifications', 'reviewboard.reviews', 'reviewboard.reviews.ui', 'reviewboard.scmtools', 'reviewboard.site', 'reviewboard.ssh', 'reviewboard.webapi', 'django_evolution'] Installed Middleware: ['django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware', 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.InitReviewBoardMiddleware', 'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware', 'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware', 'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware', 'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware', 'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware', 'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware', 'django.contrib.messages.middleware.MessageMiddleware', 'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware', 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware', 'djblets.extensions.middleware.ExtensionsMiddleware', 'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 12:54 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- I am using linux: 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@svrrb1 rb]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb [root@svrrb1 rb]# ls -l total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 css drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 images drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 js [root@svrrb1 static]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static [root@svrrb1 static]# ls -lrt total 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 95 Feb 5 23:18 rb - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 96 Feb 5 23:18 lib - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 77 Feb 5 23:18 djblets - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/static lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 98 Feb 5 23:18 admin - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin What to do !! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Yep, it's looking for lessc, which it shouldn't be. That means it's not finding the generated static media files, probably. Or some other strange configuration problem. Probably an installation problem. To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site', correct? If you did do the rb-site upgrade when you installed 1.7.4, then can you show me what's in your $sitedir/htdocs/static/rb/css/ and $sitedir/htdocs/static/djblets/css/ directories? What version of what distro are you using? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Here are the logs its seems it searching for lessc executable. Environment: Request Method: GET Request URL: http://scrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/?view=to-me Django Version: 1.4.3 Python Version: 2.7.2 Installed Applications: ['django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.markup', 'django.contrib.sites', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.staticfiles', 'djblets.datagrid', 'djblets.extensions', 'djblets.feedview', 'djblets.gravatars', 'djblets.log', 'djblets.pipeline', 'djblets.siteconfig', 'djblets.util', 'djblets.webapi', 'pipeline', 'reviewboard.accounts', 'reviewboard.admin', 'reviewboard.attachments', 'reviewboard.changedescs', 'reviewboard.diffviewer', 'reviewboard.extensions', 'reviewboard.hostingsvcs', 'reviewboard.notifications', 'reviewboard.reviews', 'reviewboard.reviews.ui', 'reviewboard.scmtools', 'reviewboard.site', 'reviewboard.ssh', 'reviewboard.webapi', 'django_evolution'] Installed Middleware: ['django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware', 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.InitReviewBoardMiddleware', 'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware', 'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css *Linux distribution:* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- I am using linux: 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@svrrb1 rb]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb [root@svrrb1 rb]# ls -l total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 css drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 images drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 js [root@svrrb1 static]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static [root@svrrb1 static]# ls -lrt total 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 95 Feb 5 23:18 rb - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/rb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 96 Feb 5 23:18 lib - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 77 Feb 5 23:18 djblets - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.7.egg/djblets/static lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 98 Feb 5 23:18 admin - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static/admin What to do !! On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Yep, it's looking for lessc, which it shouldn't be. That means it's not finding the generated static media files, probably. Or some other strange configuration problem. Probably an installation problem. To verify, when you
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:14 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css Linux distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- I am using linux: 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@svrrb1 rb]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb [root@svrrb1 rb]# ls -l total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 css drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 images drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 5 23:15 js [root@svrrb1 static]# pwd /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static [root@svrrb1 static]# ls -lrt total 16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 95 Feb 5 23:18
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Thank you !!, yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation error. CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/ /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Request Method: GET Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/ Django Version: 1.4.3 Exception Type: CompilerError Exception Value: /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py in execute_command, line 101 Python Executable: /usr/bin/python One question though while we try to fix this issue. Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade, do we have such option? in case we land up no where :( Thing are looking dark now On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css *Linux distribution:* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Adding baseline
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
This isn't a database problem, or a Review Board problem. It's something screwy on the system. When Review Board includes a stylesheet or JavaScript file, it attempts to find a compiled (*.min.*) file. If it finds it, it uses it. If not, it will attempt to compile it. For CSS, we compile using lessc. No user should ever hit the case where lessc is needed. That only happens for local development of Review Board, and for packaging. The reason being that we ship all the compiled files, as you have verified. The only way you get into a situation where it tries to compile it on a production system is when Review Board (or rather, Apache's process) is unable to access those files. Either the path is wrong somehow (this should only happen if you specifically overwrote it in your $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py file), or something is preventing Apache from accessing those files. I'll need an answer on whether SELinux is turned on, and what happens if you turn it off. SELinux can limit what a process has access to, so we absolutely need to verify that. Also, your version of RHEL is pretty old. Your very best bet for the future would be to install on something more modern, preferably Ubuntu or Fedora, as both have really good support for Review Board. That would also eliminate the other errors you saw. First things first, though. Check on SELinux. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:52 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you !!, yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation error. CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/ /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Request Method: GET Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/ Django Version: 1.4.3 Exception Type: CompilerError Exception Value: /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py in execute_command, line 101 Python Executable: /usr/bin/python One question though while we try to fix this issue. Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade, do we have such option? in case we land up no where :( Thing are looking dark now On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css Linux distribution: Red Hat
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Also SElinux is turned off. #selinuxenabled echo enabled || echo disabled disabled On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you !!, yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation error. CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/ /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Request Method: GET Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/ Django Version: 1.4.3 Exception Type: CompilerError Exception Value: /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py in execute_command, line 101 Python Executable: /usr/bin/python One question though while we try to fix this issue. Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade, do we have such option? in case we land up no where :( Thing are looking dark now On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css *Linux distribution:* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while. The log output below, including warnings and errors, can be ignored unless upgrade fails. -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Creating table extensions_registeredextension Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Can you provide your settings_local.py file? Make sure to remove your database information and your SECRET_KEY first! Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:58 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Also SElinux is turned off. #selinuxenabled echo enabled || echo disabled disabled On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you !!, yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation error. CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/ /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Request Method: GET Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/ Django Version: 1.4.3 Exception Type: CompilerError Exception Value: /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py in execute_command, line 101 Python Executable: /usr/bin/python One question though while we try to fix this issue. Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade, do we have such option? in case we land up no where :( Thing are looking dark now On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css Linux distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: yes you are correct i followed the upgrade instruction from www.reviewboard.org To verify, when you upgraded using easy_install -U ReviewBoard, you then ran 'rb-site upgrade /path/to/site' I also saw below message, [root@svrrb1 www]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/svrrb /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Sure please see below:
# Site-specific configuration settings for Review Board
# Definitions of these settings can be found at
# http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/
# Database configuration
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.mysql',
'NAME': 'svrrb',
'USER': 'username',
'PASSWORD': 'password',
'HOST': 'localhost',
'PORT': '',
},
}
# Unique secret key. Don't share this with anybody.
SECRET_KEY = 'key value '
# Cache backend settings.
CACHES = {
'default': {
'BACKEND': 'django.core.cache.backends.memcached.MemcachedCache',
'LOCATION': 'localhost:11211',
},
}
# Extra site information.
SITE_ID = 1
SITE_ROOT = '/svrrb/'
FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME = ''
DEBUG = True
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Can you provide your settings_local.py file? Make sure to remove your
database information and your SECRET_KEY first!
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote:
Also SElinux is turned off.
#selinuxenabled echo enabled || echo disabled
disabled
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you !!,
yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am
not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation
error.
CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/
/usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/
Django Version: 1.4.3
Exception Type: CompilerError
Exception Value:
/usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory
Exception Location:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py
in execute_command, line 101
Python Executable: /usr/bin/python
One question though while we try to fix this issue.
Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade,
do we have such option? in case we land up no where :(
Thing are looking dark now
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review
Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating
new ones (using lessc).
Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to.
Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off.
You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is
cached somewhere.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward.
Here you go:
here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css
admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css
dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css
js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css
syntax.5f96383e25b8.css
admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css
dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less
js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css
admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css
dashboard.css docs.css
js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css
admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less
dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css
js-tests.less reviews.min.css
admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css
defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css
js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less
admin-dashboard.csscommon.less
defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css
js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css
admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css
diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css
reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css
admin.less common.min.css
diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css
reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less
/var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css
[root@svrrb1 css]# ls
admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css
datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css
*Linux distribution:*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
Kernel \r on an \m
Thank you for you help.
Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it
to you.
-CJ
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond
chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
And you restarted Apache afterward?
I'll need to see the contents of the css directories.
I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using.
Christian
--
Christian
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Okay, looks fine. I'd suggest creating a second RB site on that server, for testing purposes. Just set it up, new database, and see if you have the same problem. If so, we can narrow it down further. It's 2:30AM here, so I need to head to bed, but I can try to help more with this tomorrow. Unfortunately, it's just not an issue I've seen in the wild before. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 2:02 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Can you provide your settings_local.py file? Make sure to remove your database information and your SECRET_KEY first! Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:58 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Also SElinux is turned off. #selinuxenabled echo enabled || echo disabled disabled On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you !!, yes it is happening for all the review request, also after restart i am not able to open login page also and it crashed with the same compilation error. CompilerError at /svrrb/dashboard/ /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Request Method: GET Request URL: http://svrrb1.na.software.com/svrrb/dashboard/ Django Version: 1.4.3 Exception Type: CompilerError Exception Value: /usr/bin/env: lessc: No such file or directory Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.3.0-py2.7.egg/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py in execute_command, line 101 Python Executable: /usr/bin/python One question though while we try to fix this issue. Can we install reviewboard fresh and then perform database base upgrade, do we have such option? in case we land up no where :( Thing are looking dark now On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: All the files match correctly, so I'm left to believe that Review Board/Apache's unable to open them, and is trying to fall back on creating new ones (using lessc). Does this happen for all review requests? I'd imagine it'd have to. Is SELinux turned on? Try turning it off. You also may want to try restarting memcached, in case something bad is cached somewhere. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, i have restarted the Apache afterward. Here you go: here is the content of ccs /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/rb/css admin.1f278e6382ef.css admin.min.c8a349cc3f7d.css dashboard.cb3f25c48eb7.cssdiffviewer.css js-tests.70d6ede4e69e.css reviews.css syntax.5f96383e25b8.css admin.60fbb7d18d8e.lessadmin.min.css dashboard.cebe4c36b08b.less diffviewer.less js-tests.9844a908a7ed.less reviews.less syntax.css admin.css common.2273b0c06c33.css dashboard.css docs.css js-tests.css reviews.min.af2c67b6345a.css admin-dashboard.0d89aa70a294.less common.7ace5f78ab0a.less dashboard.lessdocs.d72d2b5acebd.css js-tests.less reviews.min.css admin-dashboard.38adf3895ca1.css common.css defs.d9851fd5c124.lessie_hacks.css js-tests.min.70d6ede4e69e.css search.0553e42c0d00.less admin-dashboard.csscommon.less defs.less ie_hacks.e31a795a9b81.css js-tests.min.css search.47a5f4d644fe.css admin-dashboard.less common.min.8d7bf2d2a824.css diffviewer.0df7f678336d.less iphone.css reviews.222d0930c962.less search.css admin.less common.min.css diffviewer.b6c23a8b7583.css iphone.e915fbaf08c1.css reviews.6b97b76026b7.css search.less /var/www/svrrb/htdocs/static/djblets/css [root@svrrb1 css]# ls admin.67612c83bb86.css admin.css datagrid.1a0aafea202a.css datagrid.css extensions.43c3ee635a23.css extensions.css Linux distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m Thank you for you help. Please let me know if you need actual files to look into, i will sent it to you. -CJ On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: And you restarted Apache afterward? I'll need to see the contents of the css directories. I also still need to know what version of what Linux distro you're using. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if you point us action item it would be really great. Few queries though 1. How does upgrade takes place, does it replace files by files ( I mean python scripts etc ) apart from db. 2. The Release note of 1.7.2 its been mentioned about below However, this requires that p4python is specially compiled with OpenSSL support, and that the system has development headers for OpenSSL 1.0.1. P4PythonInstaller doesn’t do this, so users who need this feature will currently have to compile p4python manually, providing the path to the SSL directory using --ssl Do we have any tech note for the above steps which end user needs to perform. Cheers, Chuck On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, There has been lots of improvement done on RB server from version 1.6.1 till date, hence i would like to know if the upgrade from 1.6.1 to latest version is supported? If not then how should I bring my RB server 1.6.1 to latest state without loosing the existing data from my existing database. We need to upgrade because 1.7.2 has SSL feature implement and we have planned to upgrade perforce server to 2012.2. Please help. Appreciated your response and help Cheers, Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4
Hi Chuck, I always recommend backing up your database first, but you should be able to upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 without any real problems. There is a bug that some people hit a while back in older versions that introduced some stale upgrade data in the database. I meant to get a final fix out in 1.7.4, but it slipped. If your 'rb-site upgrade' complains about fields that already exist or something, e-mail and I'll give you the solution. Otherwise, you shouldn't have any problems. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:17 AM, chuck j cjerry2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, There has been lots of improvement done on RB server from version 1.6.1 till date, hence i would like to know if the upgrade from 1.6.1 to latest version is supported? If not then how should I bring my RB server 1.6.1 to latest state without loosing the existing data from my existing database. We need to upgrade because 1.7.2 has SSL feature implement and we have planned to upgrade perforce server to 2012.2. Please help. Appreciated your response and help Cheers, Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
