Hi, David,
Sorry for my poor knowledge for python... I'm a java programmer indeed.
I'm wondering if Nginx +uWSGI will work to provide the better performance?
or any other candidate?
在 2014年9月10日星期三UTC+8上午5时40分20秒，David Trowbridge写道：
I think a lot of the performance issues you're seeing are
The deployment we've tested most is using apache + mod_wsgi (and sometimes
also using nginx for the static media serving). I personally haven't tested
it, but nginx+uWSGI should be a fairy big step up over fastcgi.
-David
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience, nginx+uwsgi gives a significant performance improvement over
Apache+mod_wsgi, but I didn’t investigate to find out how much of that comes
from better static file service.
On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, David Trowbridge
trowb...@gmail.commailto:trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
The
I think a lot of the performance issues you're seeing are probably due to
using fastcgi. Can you switch to a wsgi-based deployment?
-David
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt/reviewboard runfcgi port=3033 host=127.0.0.1
protocol=fcgi daemonize=true pidfile=/opt/reviewboard/rb.pid maxspare=20
anything else?
thx a lot for ur kindly help.
在
No idea if settings.py, and settings_local.py will help. :)
在 2014年9月9日星期二UTC+8上午9时55分10秒，Magic Chen写道：
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt/reviewboard runfcgi port=3033 host=127.0.0.1
protocol=fcgi
Can you give us some information about your web server configuration?
-David
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I've install the latest 2.0.6 version in a CentOS (4G, 4Core), and the
functions is working correctly,
but we noticed that the
