Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Marcos

You were right, is not that.

On Oct 7, 5:12 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think the slashes will matter.  you have both most likely because
> your client root is C:/CODE instead of C:\CODE
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think the issue might be on this line:
>
> > >>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx
> > C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp
>
> > Slash and backslash together, does not sound right.
> > Any ideas?
>
> > On Oct 7, 4:42 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Now I get this error:
> > > Unable to parse diff header: : Invalid argument
>
> > > This is the debug output
>
> > > J:\>post-review.py -n --debug --diff-only 56843
>
> > > >>> Repository info 'Path: perforce.server.com:1666, Base path: None,
> > Supports changesets: True'
> > > >>> Generating diff for changenum 56843
> > > >>> p4 describe -s 56843
> > > >>> Processing edit of
> > //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> > > >>> Writing "//project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1"
> > to "c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx"
> > > >>> p4 print -q //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1
> > > >>> p4 where //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> > > >>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx
> > C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp
>
> > > On Oct 7, 4:21 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Cool, those are great news.
> > > > Thanks for the reply.
>
> > > > On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move
> > the
> > > > > files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
> > > > > post-review.
>
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Greetings.
>
> > > > > > I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> > > > > > the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> > > > > > make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on
> > not
> > > > > > committed changes.
>
> > > > > > I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard
> > p4
> > > > > > diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> > > > > > flag).
> > > > > > So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of
> > review-board
> > > > > > with not submitted changes?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Joshua Slominski
I don't think the slashes will matter.  you have both most likely because
your client root is C:/CODE instead of C:\CODE

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I think the issue might be on this line:
>
> >>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx
> C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp
>
> Slash and backslash together, does not sound right.
> Any ideas?
>
> On Oct 7, 4:42 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I get this error:
> > Unable to parse diff header: : Invalid argument
> >
> > This is the debug output
> >
> > J:\>post-review.py -n --debug --diff-only 56843
> >
> > >>> Repository info 'Path: perforce.server.com:1666, Base path: None,
> Supports changesets: True'
> > >>> Generating diff for changenum 56843
> > >>> p4 describe -s 56843
> > >>> Processing edit of
> //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> > >>> Writing "//project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1"
> to "c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx"
> > >>> p4 print -q //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1
> > >>> p4 where //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> > >>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx
> C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp
> >
> > On Oct 7, 4:21 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Cool, those are great news.
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > > On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move
> the
> > > > files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
> > > > post-review.
> >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Greetings.
> >
> > > > > I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> > > > > the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> > > > > make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on
> not
> > > > > committed changes.
> >
> > > > > I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard
> p4
> > > > > diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> > > > > flag).
> > > > > So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of
> review-board
> > > > > with not submitted changes?
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Marcos

I think the issue might be on this line:

>>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx 
>>> C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp

Slash and backslash together, does not sound right.
Any ideas?

On Oct 7, 4:42 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I get this error:
> Unable to parse diff header: : Invalid argument
>
> This is the debug output
>
> J:\>post-review.py -n --debug --diff-only 56843
>
> >>> Repository info 'Path: perforce.server.com:1666, Base path: None, 
> >>> Supports changesets: True'
> >>> Generating diff for changenum 56843
> >>> p4 describe -s 56843
> >>> Processing edit of //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> >>> Writing "//project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1" to 
> >>> "c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx"
> >>> p4 print -q //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1
> >>> p4 where //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
> >>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx 
> >>> C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp
>
> On Oct 7, 4:21 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Cool, those are great news.
> > Thanks for the reply.
>
> > On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move the
> > > files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
> > > post-review.
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Greetings.
>
> > > > I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> > > > the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> > > > make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on not
> > > > committed changes.
>
> > > > I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard p4
> > > > diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> > > > flag).
> > > > So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of review-board
> > > > with not submitted changes?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Marcos

Now I get this error:
Unable to parse diff header: : Invalid argument

This is the debug output

J:\>post-review.py -n --debug --diff-only 56843
>>> Repository info 'Path: perforce.server.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports 
>>> changesets: True'
>>> Generating diff for changenum 56843
>>> p4 describe -s 56843
>>> Processing edit of //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
>>> Writing "//project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1" to 
>>> "c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx"
>>> p4 print -q //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp#1
>>> p4 where //project/branches/my_branch/client/GUI/StartWindow.cpp
>>> diff -urNp c:\docume~1\marcosp\locals~1\temp\tmpvzainx 
>>> C:/CODE\branches\my_branch\client\GUI\StartWindow.cpp

On Oct 7, 4:21 pm, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, those are great news.
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move the
> > files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
> > post-review.
>
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Greetings.
>
> > > I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> > > the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> > > make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on not
> > > committed changes.
>
> > > I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard p4
> > > diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> > > flag).
> > > So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of review-board
> > > with not submitted changes?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Marcos

Cool, those are great news.
Thanks for the reply.

On Oct 7, 3:25 pm, "Joshua Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move the
> files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
> post-review.
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings.
>
> > I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> > the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> > make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on not
> > committed changes.
>
> > I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard p4
> > diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> > flag).
> > So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of review-board
> > with not submitted changes?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Using Perforce and Pre-Reviews

2008-10-07 Thread Joshua Slominski
A better name for post-review is post-a-review.  As long as you move the
files you wish to review out of the default changelist you can use
post-review.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Greetings.
>
> I installed reviewboard, and it seems to work ok using post-review,
> the only issue with is is that (as the name says) post-review is to
> make reviews already submitted, on what I want to do is use it on not
> committed changes.
>
> I use perforce, and that is why I am using post-review (as I heard p4
> diff is broken, even I think that strange, specially using the -du
> flag).
> So does any one has a wrapper to p4 that allows the us of review-board
> with not submitted changes?
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---