You also have to know that the forest extension is being deprecated in favor
of the integrated mercurial subrepositories.
However, this leaves you in the same situation of finding someone to work on
it.
Regards.
Gilles.
On Monday 30 August 2010 12:23:50 am Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are no current plans to implement this. So far, Mercurial support has
> been entirely developed by third parties interested in contributing to
> Review Board. If someone wants to improve our support to handle Forests,
> we'll gladly work with them to do so.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:48 AM, sergius
wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is there plans, by any chance, to add support for mercurial forest
> > extension? (See http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ForestExtension)
> >
> > For now we add rb repository for each forest subrepos. So, commit
> > which contains changes in several repositories have to be splitted to
> > several review requests. It would be great to have just one rb-repo
> > corresponding to forest repository.
> >
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >groups.com> For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
