Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
You really should be using the packages and not the tarball. If you're using Python 2.4, you will need to upgrade to a newer 2.x release (2.7 is recommended). Christian On Dec 21, 2012, at 23:55, 李海梅 lihaimei880...@gmail.com wrote: can you tell me how you solve the problem runtimeerror: failed to build media... you mentioned that you install jsmin..what's that? hope to get your reply. thank you... 在 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8下午2时53分07秒，kvr写道： Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing jsmin ... On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
can you tell me how you solve the problem runtimeerror: failed to build media... you mentioned that you install jsmin..what's that? hope to get your reply. thank you... 在 2012年10月3日星期三UTC+8下午2时53分07秒，kvr写道： Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing *jsmin* ... On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Thank you so much that resolved the issue along with installing *jsmin* ... On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Here is the output of ./contrib/internal/build-media.py Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_clicked.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.ico' (not modified) Skipping 'images/diff.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/subnav-bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg_trans.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-draft-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.svg' (not modified) Skipping 'images/dropdown.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/disabled.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/reviewrequest.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_hover.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/button_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/star_off.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/list.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/db-add.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/logo.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/title_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_clicked.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/fish-trophy.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/gold_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/warning.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/delete.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/closed_issue.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon.ico' (not modified) Skipping 'images/cancel_grey.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/star_on.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/collapse.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/tick.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/rss.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/blank.gif' (not modified) Skipping 'images/upload.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/convo.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit_checkmark.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_hover.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/spinner.gif' (not modified) Skipping 'images/resize-grip.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/gold_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/edit.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-shipit-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/open_issue.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_top_bg_trans.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/trophy.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/delete.svg' (not modified) Skipping 'images/moved_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/important.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/expand.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toggleOn.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/pinstripes.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrowSel.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/selection.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/whiteButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toolbar.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/thumb.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/cancel.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/blueButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toggle.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrow.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listGroup.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/backButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/grayButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toolButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-auth.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-storage.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/wid-max.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg_primary.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/divid.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/alert_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-log.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/gears.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/wid-min.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-ssh.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/monitor.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/play.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/yellow_bg_small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-diff.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-address-book.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/mimetypes/text-x-generic.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-document.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/mimetypes/x-office-presentation-template.png' (not modified) Skipping
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
You'd need RB 1.7 beta 2 and the accompanying Djblets, and a newer django pipeline. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: Here is the output of ./contrib/internal/build-media.py Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_clicked.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.ico' (not modified) Skipping 'images/diff.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/subnav-bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg_trans.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-draft-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.svg' (not modified) Skipping 'images/dropdown.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/disabled.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/reviewrequest.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg_hover.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/button_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/star_off.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/list.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/db-add.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/logo.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/title_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_clicked.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/fish-trophy.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/gold_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/warning.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/delete.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/closed_issue.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon_notify.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon.ico' (not modified) Skipping 'images/cancel_grey.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/star_on.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/collapse.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/tick.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/rss.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/blank.gif' (not modified) Skipping 'images/upload.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/convo.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/shipit_checkmark.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_bg_hover.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/spinner.gif' (not modified) Skipping 'images/resize-grip.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_bottom_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/gold_box_top_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/edit.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/comment-shipit-small.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/open_issue.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/review_request_action_primary_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/apple-home-icon.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/favicon.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/box_top_bg_trans.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/trophy.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/delete.svg' (not modified) Skipping 'images/moved_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/important.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/expand.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toggleOn.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/pinstripes.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrowSel.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/selection.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/whiteButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toolbar.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/thumb.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/cancel.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/blueButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toggle.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listArrow.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/listGroup.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/backButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/grayButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/iphone/toolButton.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-auth.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-storage.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/wid-max.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/header_bg_primary.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/divid.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/alert_bg.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-log.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/gears.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/wid-min.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/set-ssh.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/monitor.png' (not modified) Skipping 'images/admin/play.png' (not modified) Skipping
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
There should be more than this. There should be some output from the script
being run.
Run ./contrib/internal/build-media.py manually and see what happens.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote:
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py,
line 172, in run
self.run_command(egg_info)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
These are last few lines of the exception thrown during building egg in
Ubuntu.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:37 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to
give you any information on a fix.
Christian
On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote:
No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while
building the media files in Ubuntu also.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build
infrastructure are assuming unixisms.
Christian
On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things
that must be installed in order to build the package.
Christian
I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code.
setup.py bdist_egg
And the result is given below.
running bdist_egg
running egg_info
running build_media
error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application
But 1.6.x code got successfully built.
On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote:
May I know how did you make the egg file?
Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out.
On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7
dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to
install from source.
On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release,
but
rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.
http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/08/03/review-board-**17-**
beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a
beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any
testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a
higher-quality release.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard...@googlegroups.**com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard...@googlegroups.**com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building the media files in Ubuntu also. On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build infrastructure are assuming unixisms. Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr kvr...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that must be installed in order to build the package. Christian I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code. setup.py bdist_egg And the result is given below. running bdist_egg running egg_info running build_media error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application But 1.6.x code got successfully built. On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: May I know how did you make the egg file? Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out. On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-** 17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
You'll get an entirely different error on Linux. I'd need to see it to give you any information on a fix. Christian On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:49, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: No even I tried in Ubuntu, but was not successful.It failed while building the media files in Ubuntu also. On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:55:08 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build infrastructure are assuming unixisms. Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that must be installed in order to build the package. Christian I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code. setup.py bdist_egg And the result is given below. running bdist_egg running egg_info running build_media error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application But 1.6.x code got successfully built. On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: May I know how did you make the egg file? Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out. On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build infrastructure are assuming unixisms. Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things that must be installed in order to build the package. Christian I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code. setup.py bdist_egg And the result is given below. running bdist_egg running egg_info running build_media error: %1 is not a valid Win32 application But 1.6.x code got successfully built. On Sep 26, 2012, at 20:26, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: May I know how did you make the egg file? Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out. On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
May I know how did you make the egg file? Because I tried with easy_install bdist_egg, but did not work out. On Saturday, September 15, 2012 4:41:12 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: In that case, grab the upstream Git version. Some of our RB 1.7 dependencies have updated and are incompatible with a source build of 1.7. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, kvr kvr...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-** 17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
You shouldn't install from source. Please use the egg files we distribute. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:41 PM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am facing problem while installing 1.7beta1 release from source. It's throwing RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error . My easy-install.pth contains below things. import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path) ./python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg ./recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg ./pytz-2012d-py2.7.egg ./python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.egg ./paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.7.egg ./flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.7.egg ./Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg ./django_evolution-0.6.7-py2.7.egg /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL ./mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg ./django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg ./Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg ./Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg ./RBTools-0.4.1-py2.7.egg ./requests-0.14.0-py2.7.egg ./Djblets-0.7.1-py2.7.egg /root/Desktop/rb_1.7 ./nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7 import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:]; p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert = p+len(new) Please help me. Regards, KVR On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-** 17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Thanks for your reply. But I've added some widgets in admin module that's why I want to install from source. On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Hi, I am facing problem while installing 1.7beta1 release from source. It's throwing RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error . My easy-install.pth contains below things. import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path) ./python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg ./recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg ./pytz-2012d-py2.7.egg ./python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.egg ./paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.7.egg ./flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.7.egg ./Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg ./django_evolution-0.6.7-py2.7.egg /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL ./mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg ./django_pipeline-1.2.14-py2.7.egg ./Django-1.4.1-py2.7.egg ./Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg ./RBTools-0.4.1-py2.7.egg ./requests-0.14.0-py2.7.egg ./Djblets-0.7.1-py2.7.egg /root/Desktop/rb_1.7 ./nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7 import sys; new=sys.path[sys.__plen:]; del sys.path[sys.__plen:]; p=getattr(sys,'__egginsert',0); sys.path[p:p]=new; sys.__egginsert = p+len(new) Please help me. Regards, KVR On Friday, August 3, 2012 2:19:58 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
I checked permissions - it turned out that ext had permissions of 755 and infact needs 775 as the user is in group www-data but the www-data needs w access to ext. Perhaps that could be added to the debug message to help other people who make the same mistake as me. Cheers Dan On Friday, August 3, 2012 7:49:01 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Daniel, The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have to migrate to. We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted into their Apache configuration. There's no way for us to know. So I wasn't completely sure, but did you create the ext directory and set the ownership on it? Can you show me a ls -ld of that directory? That should be the last thing you'd need to configure. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com wrote: I have tried to install this release. I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by specifying -f to easy_install. Onc done I then did rb-site upgrade /path/my/site This took a while and generated the following: Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images) has changed. You will need to make manual changes to your web server configuration. For Apache, you will need to add: Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url: /static = /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static Once you have made these changes, type the following to resolve this: $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan resolve-check static-media I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias. However did that and then ran the command specified. I then restarted memcached and apache. However I now get a splash screen that says: *Manual server updates required **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list.* But I have done this: It also says: *Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files. **Your extensions media directory is currently at: /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **Permission problems **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, you can fix this by typing: **$ sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to www-data.* But I have also checked this. Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further? Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands: */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82: DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES instead. ** DeprecationWarning* I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server. Cheers Dan On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-** 17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For
URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the
dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary
on fedora once you have a package for it?
Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it
doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet.
Ah well, one step at a time.
Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today.
Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard:
Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument
'outdated'
This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline
1.2.14.
Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the
Fedora 18 deadline :(
Full traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90,
in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 99,
in pack
paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 93,
in compile
return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py, line
41, in compile
compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated,
force=force)
TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install)
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know
for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now?
Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not
completely sure about yet.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out
of the dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully
necessary on fedora once you have a package for it?
Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it
doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet.
Ah well, one step at a time.
Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today.
Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard:
Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument
'outdated'
This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline
1.2.14.
Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the
Fedora 18 deadline :(
Full traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90,
in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 99,
in pack
paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 93,
in compile
return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py, line
41, in compile
compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated,
force=force)
TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py,
line 29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install)
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not completely sure about yet. Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora. (It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version being lower). I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it working in the meantime? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in pipeline. Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in pipeline for the package. I'll keep you informed as I learn more. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not completely sure about yet. Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora. (It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version being lower). I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it working in the meantime? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
This branch has what we need on the djblets side: https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced the first occurrence to revision dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:33 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in pipeline. Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in pipeline for the package. I'll keep you informed as I learn more. Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm attacking it on my end as well. Do you have a github with your in-progress changes I could sync to, so we don't duplicate effort? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:54 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
This branch has what we need on the djblets side:
https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix
Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems
with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced
the first occurrence to revision
dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on
master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm?
I get the following traceback with your bless patch (as expected):
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
packager.pack_stylesheets(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90,
in pack_stylesheets
variant=package.variant, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 72, in compress_css
css = self.concatenate_and_rewrite(paths, output_filename, variant)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 135, in concatenate_and_rewrite
content = self.read_file(path)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 208, in read_file
file = default_storage.open(path, 'rb')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py,
line 33, in open
return self._open(name, mode)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 114,
in _open
storage = self.find_storage(name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 111,
in find_storage
raise ValueError(The file '%s' could not be found with %r. %
(name, self))
ValueError: The file 'rb/css/diffviewer.css' could not be found with
pipeline.storage.PipelineFinderStorage object at 0x1aeaad0.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pmGIf8 (%install)
Looking at the pipeline commit you referenced, I can understand why it's
still having issue. That patch is just an exception-catcher for an
underlying issue that they must have introduced earlier. I'm going to
see if I can spot an earlier patch that may have introduced the issue
with writing to a static root (unless that's an assumption that Review
Board is making that it should not be).
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:50 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to come from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the code doesn't look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep pointing to it. This is revision 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178. From further investigation, it looks like that patch was completely broken until they added both c1ff4867fe57a9fffbddae38b51d888c85304a87 and fb51fba3f391a9685f4ab65757e7511e3f927df8 to fix it properly. So we're probably getting a false-positive from git bisect because those two patches are also not included. Maybe a quick 'git rebase -i' to merge those into 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178 will allow git bisect to find the real culprit? The only other thing I noticed was that they did change behavior in one place in that code. In Compiler.compile(), they were previously passing output_path to the compilers as the output argument, but this patch changes that to be output_file as determined by finders.find(). Being unfamiliar with the code and the return type of finders.find(), I can't say whether this is relevant. Thanks very much for your help on this Christian, but at this point (with my deadline running close and the hour growing late), I'm just going to go the downgrade route and treat this as a life-lesson: always test version compatibility before making a release. Thanks again, and if we find a solution for this later on, I can still upgrade django_pipeline back up to a recent release. I'll just be carrying the annoying epoch version-mangle forever. C'est la vie. Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now. So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so I can rev the version back up. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
no, apparently not.
I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
out.
Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
I can rev the version back up.
One more problem :(
Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
106, in pack_javascripts
return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 65, in compress_js
js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py, line
10, in compress_js
from jsmin import jsmin
ImportError: No module named jsmin
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line
29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
no, apparently not.
I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
out.
Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
I can rev the version back up.
One more problem :(
Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
106, in pack_javascripts
return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 65, in compress_js
js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py,
line 10, in compress_js
from jsmin import jsmin
ImportError: No module named jsmin
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py,
line 29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)
*sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclared runtime
dependency on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin/
Looks like I'll have to try to package that in the morning. Review Board
is probably not going to make it into the Fedora Alpha release.
Hopefully they'll let me sneak it in for Beta (since 1.6.x is FTBFS with
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Aug 6, 2012, at 19:16, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
no, apparently not.
I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy
and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured
out.
Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble.
Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora
servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any
of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out
of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now.
So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline
upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so
I can rev the version back up.
One more problem :(
Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume
there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 150, in call_command
return klass.execute(*args, **defaults)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
232, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line
371, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 163, in handle_noargs
collected = self.collect()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 119, in collect
dry_run=self.dry_run)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30,
in post_process
output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
106, in pack_javascripts
return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js,
js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line
100, in pack
content = compress(paths, **kwargs)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py,
line 65, in compress_js
js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py,
line 10, in compress_js
from jsmin import jsmin
ImportError: No module named jsmin
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 182, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py,
line 29, in run
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 81, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install)
*sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclared runtime
dependency on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin/
Looks like I'll have to try to package that in the morning. Review Board
is probably not going to make it into the Fedora Alpha release.
Hopefully they'll let me sneak it in for Beta (since 1.6.x is FTBFS with
Django 1.4)
It's
Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 01:49 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this
release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news
post.
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/
Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta,
so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any
testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure
a higher-quality release.
The tarball for Djblets 0.7 is missing the contrib directory, so I
cannot generate the media files from it. Could you please re-release it?
/usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7-1.fc18.x86_64
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
error: No such file or directory
Just copying the contrib directory from git in does not seem to work
either, I get the following when running 'python setup.py install'
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 18, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 134, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 70, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 57, in __init__
self.storage.path('')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py,
line 184, in inner
self._setup()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py, line
279, in _setup
self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py,
line 277, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s'
% (module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
module pipeline.storage: No module named pipeline.storage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 123, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 563, in
run
self.run_command('build')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py, line 127, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
92, in run
self.build_package_data()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
147, in build_package_data
for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
104, in __getattr__
self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
115, in _get_data_files
self.analyze_manifest()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
167, in analyze_manifest
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 47, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 65, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
I have tried to install this release. I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by specifying -f to easy_install. Onc done I then did rb-site upgrade /path/my/site This took a while and generated the following: Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images) has changed. You will need to make manual changes to your web server configuration. For Apache, you will need to add: Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url: /static = /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static Once you have made these changes, type the following to resolve this: $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan resolve-check static-media I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias. However did that and then ran the command specified. I then restarted memcached and apache. However I now get a splash screen that says: *Manual server updates required **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list.* But I have done this: It also says: *Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files. **Your extensions media directory is currently at: /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **Permission problems **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, you can fix this by typing: **$ sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to www-data.* But I have also checked this. Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further? Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands: */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82: DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES instead. ** DeprecationWarning* I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server. Cheers Dan On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Hi Daniel, The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have to migrate to. We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted into their Apache configuration. There's no way for us to know. So I wasn't completely sure, but did you create the ext directory and set the ownership on it? Can you show me a ls -ld of that directory? That should be the last thing you'd need to configure. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird daniel.j.la...@googlemail.comwrote: I have tried to install this release. I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by specifying -f to easy_install. Onc done I then did rb-site upgrade /path/my/site This took a while and generated the following: Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1 There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Adding baseline version for new models Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete. The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images) has changed. You will need to make manual changes to your web server configuration. For Apache, you will need to add: Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url: /static = /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static Once you have made these changes, type the following to resolve this: $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan resolve-check static-media I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias. However did that and then ran the command specified. I then restarted memcached and apache. However I now get a splash screen that says: *Manual server updates required **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list.* But I have done this: It also says: *Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files. **Your extensions media directory is currently at: /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **Permission problems **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, you can fix this by typing: **$ sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to www-data.* But I have also checked this. Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further? Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands: */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82: DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES instead. ** DeprecationWarning* I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server. Cheers Dan On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-** 17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/ Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:46 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.
What is pipeline.storage, and is it a new dependency I need to have in
on the build system?
Still getting:
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7.1-1.fc18.x86_64
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 18, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 134, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 70, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 57, in __init__
self.storage.path('')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py,
line 184, in inner
self._setup()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py, line
279, in _setup
self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py,
line 277, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s'
% (module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
module pipeline.storage: No module named pipeline.storage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 123, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 563, in
run
self.run_command('build')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py, line 127, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
92, in run
self.build_package_data()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
147, in build_package_data
for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
104, in __getattr__
self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
115, in _get_data_files
self.analyze_manifest()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
167, in analyze_manifest
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 47, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 65, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the
dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on
fedora once you have a package for it?
Christian
On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:17, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:46 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.
What is pipeline.storage, and is it a new dependency I need to have in
on the build system?
Still getting:
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root /home/sgallagh/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-djblets-0.7.1-1.fc18.x86_64
running install
running build
running build_py
running egg_info
running build_media
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 18, in module
ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 134, in call_command
klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py,
line 70, in load_command_class
return module.Command()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py,
line 57, in __init__
self.storage.path('')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/utils/functional.py,
line 184, in inner
self._setup()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 279, in _setup
self._wrapped = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py,
line 277, in get_storage_class
raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: %s'
% (module, e))
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage
module pipeline.storage: No module named pipeline.storage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 123, in module
Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules,
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup
dist.run_commands()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in
run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py,
line 53, in run
return _install.run(self)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 563, in
run
self.run_command('build')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/build.py, line 127, in
run
self.run_command(cmd_name)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
92, in run
self.build_package_data()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
147, in build_package_data
for package, src_dir, build_dir, filenames in self.data_files:
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
104, in __getattr__
self.data_files = files = self._get_data_files(); return files
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
115, in _get_data_files
self.analyze_manifest()
File
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/build_py.py, line
167, in analyze_manifest
self.run_command('egg_info')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 47, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in
run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File setup.py, line 65, in run
raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it). I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on fedora once you have a package for it? Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet. Ah well, one step at a time. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
