It's a harmless warning due to some garbage collection and some registered
signals. I tried fixing this once, but didn't have luck.
Can you file a bug on this, to help track it?
Thanks!
Christian
On Friday, July 24, 2015, Greg Jacobs gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Another bug noticed
Another bug noticed during index cron job execution with the beta2 2.5
release:
Output from command /usr/bin/python /usr/local/bin/rb-site manage
/var/www/reviews.clearpathrobotics.com update_index -- -a 1 ..
Indexing 11 users
Indexing 1 review requests
Exception TypeError:
Ah okay, that makes more sense.
I've had reports of both issues. I've been spending time on the interdiff
issue, and I know what's wrong. A bit tricky to fix, but I'm aiming for
2.0.19 for a fix there.
For the caching issue, I need a solid, reliable retro case. I've tried
debugging this before,
One other note. I had to re-assert group ownership on the RB site, it was
breaking LDAP auth.
sudo chgrp -R www-data /var/www/your-site-name
I was getting the following in debug logs...
2015-07-23 13:35:57,514 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'info': 'invalid DN',
'desc': 'Invalid DN syntax'}
This
Hi Christian,
I occasionally see bugs when using rbt post to push up multiple drafts
before I publish. I suspect that a previous draft is cached server side,
browser cache clearing and memcached restarts fail to fix the issue.
Repeat use of rbt post following local code changes doesn't
# easy_install --version
setuptools 3.3
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version of
Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in
Hi,
Looks like for whatever reason, your install pulled down an old version of
Djblets. It should have grabbed 0.9 beta 2, not beta 1.
The whole install process in your log looks questionable, though. It pulled
down the .tar.gz and not the .egg, which I'm surprised about. So, that's
also a
Hi Paul,
These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and behave
differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may backport
some of these fixes).
Are there particular fixes you're interested in?
Christain
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end. Thanks
all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference by others - you can give this blessing or scream that its a bad
idea:
sudo service apache2 stop
sudo easy_install \
-f
Ah, looks like the problem is due to the package name you used. You want
ReviewBoard (or ReviewBoard==2.5b2) and not ReviewBoard-2.5b2. The
latter isn't being found as a package name, and it's trying hard to fulfill
the request by finding a source tarball matching the name given as a last
resort.
@googlegroups.com
Cc: reviewboard-...@googlegroups.com reviewboard-...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Review Board 2.5 beta 2 is out!
That did the trick ( ReviewBoard==2.5b2) ... so PEBKAC on my end. Thanks
all!
So I upgraded a test 2.5 beta1 system to beta2 by doing the following for
reference
Hi Christian,
I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes:
* Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from rebased
changes
Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch?
Thanks,
Paul
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further if
sane path - else if not supported assuming nuke the Django site and leave
db in place?)
The upgrade fails at:
File
I should also note, I do have markdown installed and working correctly etc.
Beta1 ran fine prior.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gjac...@clearpathrobotics.com wrote:
Is there an upgrade path from beta1 to beta2?
Running into the following error trying an upgrade ( I'll debug further if
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing
to help make this happen.
You can read our announcement,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after.
16 matches
Mail list logo