Does \var\www exist? That's typically a Linux path.
It didn't, no. I was following the installation instructions to the
letter.
I changed the directory an existing directory on the Windows box and
it was happier.
Thanks.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Does \var\www exist? That's typically a Linux path.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz
mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a Windows machine for evaluation.
After fighting my way through the Windows installation, which may or
may not have been successful, I then moved through to the Creating a
Review Board Site section (http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/
admin
- http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz
mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a Windows machine for evaluation.
After fighting my way through the Windows
Thanks for any assistance.
I should add that I'm attempting to install version 1.6 on Windows via
this link:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/admin/installation/windows/
Thanks.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy
You may get more information as to which operation is failing.
The error is as follows:
[Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: '\\var\\www\
\reviews.example.com'
Thanks.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user?
Hello?
On Jun 21, 12:28 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So I used easy_install for installing RBTools (ran easy_install -U
RBTools)
It installed C:\Python25\Scripts\post-review.exe
\post-
review.exe.manifest
Hi Peter.
As far as I know, Christian is leaving these days. That's why the support
delay. I am sorry about that.
I am not the last word on that. The three scripts above are what easy_intall
suppose to install. Is there anything not working?
Thanks
Hongbin
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:57 PM,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:57 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello?
On Jun 21, 12:28 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So I used easy_install for installing RBTools (ran easy_install -U
RBTools)
It installed C:\Python25\Scripts\post-review.exe
Hi,
So I used easy_install for installing RBTools (ran easy_install -U
RBTools)
It installed C:\Python25\Scripts\post-review.exe
\post-
review.exe.manifest
\post-review-script.py
and
I'm trying to install Review Board 1.5 on Windows Server 2008
following the installation steps in the documentation.
The following command easy_install ReviewBoard fails to install the
paramiko dependency. It looks like the paramiko download link is
broken.
Any insight on how can I proceed with
Hi Christian,
I was doing a lot of debugging leading up to getting fastcgi working
on Windows (I just didn't want to use apache, go figure). I did a lot
of starting/restarting, but it always came back to that update
required.
Here are 2 anomalies that may explain it:
1) I just realized that I
Hi folks,
Still powering through this. I used nginx to get it up and going, and
now I'm getting my first RB page. However, it gives these errors:
Manual server updates required
A recent change requires manual updates to be made on this server.
After these changes are made, you should restart
OK, found it. Needed to do the ./manage.py fixscreenshots
On Apr 6, 10:22 pm, drmikecrowe drmikecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Still powering through this. I used nginx to get it up and going, and
now I'm getting my first RB page. However, it gives these errors:
Manual server updates
Hi Mike,
The reviewboard.fcgi script is a Python shell script. It was written with
the assumption of being executed like other *nix shell scripts, where the
first line indicates which interpreter will run the file. On Windows, this
isn't usually the case unless you're running in cygwin or
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Owner: chipx86
Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 OpSys-Windows
Comment #2 on issue 1014 by chipx86: Incomplete doc for Windows installation
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1014
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 1014 by chipx86: Incomplete doc for Windows installation
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1014
Fixed in r1912. This will be updated in tonight's site refresh.
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #1 on issue 1014 by sebastien.saunier: Incomplete doc for Windows
installation
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1014
That would be useful. I spent an hour trying to figure out why the Diff
view was not working. Apache or python
didn't log anything...
--
You
Nice! Thanks for doing that :) Do you plan to keep this page up long-term?
I'd like to take the notes and include them all in the official docs, and I
can link to you and your page in a credits section.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
Yep. No plans to move or remove it. It would be good to see the info
incorporated into the Review Board documentation - especially if people
who know better than me can correct or improve on some the the things I
could have done better.
Christian Hammond said the following on 05/03/2009
I had a quick go at memcached this morning and it seems to have
worked. I've added the details here :
http://waveydavey.wordpress.com/home/computing/installing-review-board-10-alpha-2-on-windows-for-perforce/#InstallingReviewBoardonWindowsforPerforce-ImprovingReviewBoardPerformanceWithmemcached
I recently installed Review Board on Windows, though I'm afraid I
wimped out of memcached for the time-being because its just a trial
installation.
I made a fairly detailed braindump on our internal wiki, and have
copied this as best I can for public viewing here:
That's an awesome braindump! I was hoping someone had memcached working,
because that was the part I was having trouble figuring out and documenting.
I'll definitely be using this list to improve the new installation docs
though, thanks!
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Do you have uploaded and uploaded/images directories owned by the web
server in your site's htdocs/media/ directory? If not, go ahead and create
them and then restart Apache.
If you're using rb-site, then rb-site /path/to/site upgrade will take care
of the syncdb, the evolve, and fixing any
I didn't need to create those directories. They were already. The
apache service is running as me (my windows domain login), and I
should have all the necessary permissions.
Running rb-site upgrade produced:
C:\apacheweb\reviewboardrb-site.py upgrade . --copy-media
Rebuilding directory
Oh, it looks like you're running an older Review Board.
Make sure to pass --upgrade to easy_install, like so:
easy_install --upgrade ReviewBoard
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
VMware, Inc.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote:
I
I'm trying to serve review board through apache 2.2.10. I just had rb-
site.py complete but I don't have the sites-available or sites-enabled
directories and it doesn't look like httpd.conf has any mention of
either. Should I look for another apache distribution?
I have tried pasting the review
Hi Sam.
Some distros don't provide a sites-available or sites-enabled. In these
cases, I'd just recommend modifying httpd.conf and append the configuration.
It sounds like you've tried this, though. Does the Apache error log say
anything? Also, make sure you have a NameVirtualHost entry somewhere
Is it still possible to host review board using the django dev server?
I've tried manage.py runserver localhost:8000 but the user interface
doesn't render properly. This is performed in the directory of a fresh
svn checkout.
I want to avoid using rb-site because I'm not having any luck serving
First off, the dev server should never be used for anything but development.
It is single-threaded and can only handle one request at a time. That means
a browser can't download several images, javascript files, etc.
simultaneously, and if one client is rendering a diff, everything else is
fully
You can only access the reviewboard server on your vm. It may be your
vm network configuration problem. If you use NAT connection, you
should configure your vm port for access outside the vm.
patchutils is needed. Or you will meet problems when submit a review
diff and view the diffs.
Cygwin is
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to install Review Board on a virtual machine (VMWare
virtual server) to play around a bit and get a feel for the
installation before I move on to a physical machine.
I've installed:
Django 1.0
Python 2.6
PIL
sqlite
I'm totally new to all of this and I'm not sure how to
32 matches
Mail list logo
