Re: Review Request 58179: For sort/partition operator, if there is only 1 reducer, display just "sort" rather than "sort/partition"

2017-05-09 Thread venkat sairam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58179/ --- (Updated May 9, 2017, 2:30 p.m.) Review request for Ambari, Abhishek Kumar,

Re: Review Request 58179: For sort/partition operator, if there is only 1 reducer, display just "sort" rather than "sort/partition"

2017-05-09 Thread belliraj hb
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58179/#review174306 --- Ship it! Ship It! - belliraj hb On May 9, 2017, 10:54 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 58179: For sort/partition operator, if there is only 1 reducer, display just "sort" rather than "sort/partition"

2017-05-09 Thread venkat sairam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58179/ --- (Updated May 9, 2017, 10:54 a.m.) Review request for Ambari, Abhishek Kumar,

Re: Review Request 58179: For sort/partition operator, if there is only 1 reducer, display just "sort" rather than "sort/partition"

2017-04-05 Thread Pallav Kulshreshtha
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58179/#review171095 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Pallav Kulshreshtha On April 4, 2017,

Review Request 58179: For sort/partition operator, if there is only 1 reducer, display just "sort" rather than "sort/partition"

2017-04-04 Thread venkat sairam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58179/ --- Review request for Ambari, Abhishek Kumar, Gaurav Nagar, Nitiraj Rathore, Padma