Re: Review Request 46355: NameNode Last Checkpoint script alert definition does not trigger based on uncommitted transactions

2016-04-19 Thread Jonathan Hurley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46355/#review129641 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jonathan Hurley On April 19, 2016, 6:04

Re: Review Request 46355: NameNode Last Checkpoint script alert definition does not trigger based on uncommitted transactions

2016-04-19 Thread Sid Wagle
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46355/ --- (Updated April 19, 2016, 10:04 p.m.) Review request for Ambari, Aravindan

Re: Review Request 46355: NameNode Last Checkpoint script alert definition does not trigger based on uncommitted transactions

2016-04-18 Thread Sid Wagle
> On April 19, 2016, 3:13 a.m., Jonathan Hurley wrote: > > Do you need to also set these new values on upgrade? I see that you put > > defaults in, but the thresholds will never show in existing configurations. Ahh dank missed upgrade, thanks for the reminder, will post updates tomorrow. -

Re: Review Request 46355: NameNode Last Checkpoint script alert definition does not trigger based on uncommitted transactions

2016-04-18 Thread Jonathan Hurley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46355/#review129475 --- Do you need to also set these new values on upgrade? I see that

Review Request 46355: NameNode Last Checkpoint script alert definition does not trigger based on uncommitted transactions

2016-04-18 Thread Sid Wagle
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46355/ --- Review request for Ambari, Aravindan Vijayan, Dmytro Sen, Jonathan Hurley, and