Re: Review Request 63684: Patch Upgrades Broken For Clients Due To Versioned LD Library

2017-11-09 Thread Jonathan Hurley
> On Nov. 9, 2017, 12:30 p.m., Nate Cole wrote: > > Do we need to consider other upgrades, e.g. from HDP-2.5 to -2.6 as well? It's not wrong to, but I don't think it's needed either. If you go from HDP 2.5 to 2.6, and then start patching on 2.6, it'll get changed at that point... - Jonathan

Re: Review Request 63684: Patch Upgrades Broken For Clients Due To Versioned LD Library

2017-11-09 Thread Nate Cole
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63684/#review190616 --- Ship it! Do we need to consider other upgrades, e.g. from

Re: Review Request 63684: Patch Upgrades Broken For Clients Due To Versioned LD Library

2017-11-08 Thread Dmitro Lisnichenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63684/#review190553 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dmitro Lisnichenko On Nov. 8, 2017,

Re: Review Request 63684: Patch Upgrades Broken For Clients Due To Versioned LD Library

2017-11-08 Thread Dmytro Grinenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63684/#review190532 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dmytro Grinenko On Nov. 8, 2017, 9:22

Review Request 63684: Patch Upgrades Broken For Clients Due To Versioned LD Library

2017-11-08 Thread Jonathan Hurley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63684/ --- Review request for Ambari, Dmytro Grinenko, Dmitro Lisnichenko, and Nate Cole.