Re: Review Request 64837: AMBARI-22696 Whitelist execute latency from Storm Ambari metrics (branch-2.6)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/#review194561 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aravindan Vijayan On Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m., Jungtaek Lim wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/ > --- > > (Updated Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Arun Mahadevan and Aravindan Vijayan. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-22696 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22696 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > --- > > We have an use case which leverages execute latency along with process > latency. Given that we only register process latency as whitelist, we would > need to add execute latency as whitelist as well. > > > Diffs > - > > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1/configuration/storm-site.xml > 558beaf8d9 > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.5/services/stack_advisor.py > 4187dc9b55 > ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.5/common/test_stack_advisor.py > 8f27d79375 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > Manually applied the change to configuration of test cluster, and confirmed > it works. > > It doesn't mean I have tested it with upgrading, so please consider verifying > it works well with various upgrade cases. > > > Thanks, > > Jungtaek Lim > >
Re: Review Request 64837: AMBARI-22696 Whitelist execute latency from Storm Ambari metrics (branch-2.6)
> On 12월 28, 2017, 1:31 오전, Aravindan Vijayan wrote: > > These changes might be needed in > > ambari/ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1.3.0/service_advisor.py > > as well. That file only exists on trunk branch. I've also published another review board for trunk branch. - Jungtaek --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/#review194559 --- On 12월 25, 2017, 4:38 오전, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/ > --- > > (Updated 12월 25, 2017, 4:38 오전) > > > Review request for Ambari, Arun Mahadevan and Aravindan Vijayan. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-22696 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22696 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > --- > > We have an use case which leverages execute latency along with process > latency. Given that we only register process latency as whitelist, we would > need to add execute latency as whitelist as well. > > > Diffs > - > > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1/configuration/storm-site.xml > 558beaf8d9 > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.5/services/stack_advisor.py > 4187dc9b55 > ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.5/common/test_stack_advisor.py > 8f27d79375 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > Manually applied the change to configuration of test cluster, and confirmed > it works. > > It doesn't mean I have tested it with upgrading, so please consider verifying > it works well with various upgrade cases. > > > Thanks, > > Jungtaek Lim > >
Re: Review Request 64837: AMBARI-22696 Whitelist execute latency from Storm Ambari metrics (branch-2.6)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/#review194559 --- These changes might be needed in ambari/ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1.3.0/service_advisor.py as well. - Aravindan Vijayan On Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m., Jungtaek Lim wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/ > --- > > (Updated Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Arun Mahadevan and Aravindan Vijayan. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-22696 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22696 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > --- > > We have an use case which leverages execute latency along with process > latency. Given that we only register process latency as whitelist, we would > need to add execute latency as whitelist as well. > > > Diffs > - > > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1/configuration/storm-site.xml > 558beaf8d9 > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.5/services/stack_advisor.py > 4187dc9b55 > ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.5/common/test_stack_advisor.py > 8f27d79375 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > Manually applied the change to configuration of test cluster, and confirmed > it works. > > It doesn't mean I have tested it with upgrading, so please consider verifying > it works well with various upgrade cases. > > > Thanks, > > Jungtaek Lim > >
Re: Review Request 64837: AMBARI-22696 Whitelist execute latency from Storm Ambari metrics (branch-2.6)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/#review194497 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Arun Mahadevan On Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m., Jungtaek Lim wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/ > --- > > (Updated Dec. 25, 2017, 4:38 a.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Arun Mahadevan and Aravindan Vijayan. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-22696 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22696 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > --- > > We have an use case which leverages execute latency along with process > latency. Given that we only register process latency as whitelist, we would > need to add execute latency as whitelist as well. > > > Diffs > - > > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1/configuration/storm-site.xml > 558beaf8d9 > ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.5/services/stack_advisor.py > 4187dc9b55 > ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.5/common/test_stack_advisor.py > 8f27d79375 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > Manually applied the change to configuration of test cluster, and confirmed > it works. > > It doesn't mean I have tested it with upgrading, so please consider verifying > it works well with various upgrade cases. > > > Thanks, > > Jungtaek Lim > >
Review Request 64837: AMBARI-22696 Whitelist execute latency from Storm Ambari metrics (branch-2.6)
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/ --- Review request for Ambari, Arun Mahadevan and Aravindan Vijayan. Bugs: AMBARI-22696 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-22696 Repository: ambari Description --- We have an use case which leverages execute latency along with process latency. Given that we only register process latency as whitelist, we would need to add execute latency as whitelist as well. Diffs - ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/STORM/1.0.1/configuration/storm-site.xml 558beaf8d9 ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.5/services/stack_advisor.py 4187dc9b55 ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.5/common/test_stack_advisor.py 8f27d79375 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64837/diff/1/ Testing --- Manually applied the change to configuration of test cluster, and confirmed it works. It doesn't mean I have tested it with upgrading, so please consider verifying it works well with various upgrade cases. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim
