On Aug. 25, 2015, 9:45 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
specs/rpm/aurora.spec, lines 62-72
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/diff/2/?file=1053012#file1053012line62
nit: could be easier to follow if source definitions matched the below
install sequence.
Done.
- Bill
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/
---
(Updated Aug. 26, 2015, 10:45 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 9:38 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Maxim
On Aug. 25, 2015, 4:12 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
specs/rpm/Makefile, lines 37-38
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/diff/1/?file=1052463#file1052463line37
This is weird as a user will never be able to upgrade from a release
version to a nightly.
Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96494
---
Ship it!
specs/rpm/aurora.spec (lines 62 - 72)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96443
---
specs/rpm/Makefile (lines 37 - 38)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96450
---
specs/rpm/Makefile (line 33)
On Aug. 25, 2015, 11:12 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
specs/rpm/Makefile, lines 37-38
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/diff/1/?file=1052463#file1052463line37
This is weird as a user will never be able to upgrade from a release
version to a nightly.
Isn't version global across RPM
