---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/#review117482
---
Sorry for coming to this only after it's committed, but I think
> On Feb. 2, 2016, 9:31 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote:
> > Sorry for coming to this only after it's committed, but I think this might
> > create trouble for operators during upgrade.
> >
> > Because the new executor will not understand the `--announce-enable` flag
> > and crashes, the operator has to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/#review116334
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Stephan Erb
On Jan. 25, 2016, 7:03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/#review116398
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Zameer Manji
On Jan. 25, 2016, 10:03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/
---
(Updated Jan. 26, 2016, 10:40 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/#review116134
---
Ship it!
Master (5684c64) is green with this patch.
> On Jan. 25, 2016, 10:27 a.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> > General question: How do we want to handle corresponding updates in the
> > packaging repo? In an immediate additional review request or in a general
> > overhaul before the next release?
Great question! So far it's been ad-hoc, with an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42727/#review116136
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 25, 2016,
