Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-15 Thread Renan DelValle
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/#review197629 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Renan DelValle On Feb. 12, 2018, 12:36

Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-15 Thread Stephan Erb
> On Feb. 14, 2018, 7:28 p.m., Renan DelValle wrote: > > build-support/jenkins/build.sh > > Lines 30 (patched) > > > > > > Do we still need --junit-xml-dir="$PWD/dist/test-results" to make the > > logs go to the

Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-14 Thread Renan DelValle
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/#review197571 --- build-support/jenkins/build.sh Lines 30 (patched)

Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-14 Thread Jordan Ly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/#review197488 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jordan Ly On Feb. 12, 2018, 8:36 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-11 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/#review197239 --- Ship it! Master (cb0faf8) is green with this patch.

Re: Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-11 Thread Stephan Erb
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/#review197238 --- build-support/jenkins/build.sh Line 28 (original), 28-30

Review Request 65598: Disable pytest-fast mode as a workaround for failing health checker tests

2018-02-11 Thread Stephan Erb
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65598/ --- Review request for Aurora. Bugs: AURORA-1972