Re: Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-28 Thread David McLaughlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21791/#review44143 --- Ping. This can be shipped to master. - David McLaughlin On May

Re: Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-28 Thread Suman Karumuri
On May 28, 2014, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote: Ping. This can be shipped to master. Can you please rebase with master. - Suman --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-22 Thread Suman Karumuri
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21791/#review43750 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Suman Karumuri On May 21, 2014, 10:35 p.m.,

Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-21 Thread David McLaughlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21791/ --- Review request for Aurora, Suman Karumuri and Mark Chu-Carroll. Bugs:

Re: Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-21 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21791/#review43664 --- I agree with the wording on the ticket more than what's done here.

Re: Review Request 21791: Do not show instance range when there is only one in group

2014-05-21 Thread David McLaughlin
On May 21, 2014, 10:42 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: I agree with the wording on the ticket more than what's done here. Having the range displayed when there's one group is still useful to see the instance count quickly. It also verifies that there are not instances 'missing' (e.g. 4-99