---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31739/#review75222
---
src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31739/
---
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Zameer Manji.
Bugs: AURORA-1158
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31739/
---
(Updated March 4, 2015, 7:30 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31739/#review75247
---
src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java
On March 4, 2015, 10:25 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java, line 269
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31739/diff/1/?file=884469#file884469line269
Is this the same single threaded scheduler used for ordinary
scheduling?
On March 4, 2015, 8:17 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
Is there a reason you did not opt to implement this behind the `Preemptor`
interface? Seems like if you went with that approach, `TaskScheduler` can
be oblivious to the background operations.
Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
Trying to
