Re: Review Request 30010: [AURORA-184] Remove hardcoded 'host' and 'rack' limit constraints

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
On Jan. 21, 2015, 6:53 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote: I talked with Florian offline and the next step for this patch is to add CLI flags so this legacy behaviour can be enabled. This way we don't break backwards compatability and users who rely on this behaviour don't get a nasty surprise

Re: Review Request 30010: [AURORA-184] Remove hardcoded 'host' and 'rack' limit constraints

2015-01-21 Thread Zameer Manji
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30010/#review68963 --- I talked with Florian offline and the next step for this patch is

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/#review68950 --- Kevin - any chance you're available to take a pass at this soon?

Re: Review Request 30010: [AURORA-184] Remove hardcoded 'host' and 'rack' limit constraints

2015-01-21 Thread Zameer Manji
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30010/#review68962 ---

Re: Review Request 29984: Minor clean up to mock usage in resource manager integration tests.

2015-01-21 Thread Brian Wickman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29984/#review68961 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Wickman On Jan. 16, 2015, 9:45 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/#review69047 --- Meta question - how do you envision us using this? When a perf

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/#review69051 --- src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 21, 2015, 11:44 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/SchedulingBenchmarks.java, line 101 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/diff/5/?file=808351#file808351line101 I think we should proceed one of two ways here: 1. whittle this down

Re: Review Request 29117: Adding thrift API changes document.

2015-01-21 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/#review69071 --- This patch does not apply cleanly on master (116ee2d), do you need

Re: Review Request 29117: Adding thrift API changes document.

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
On Jan. 9, 2015, 6:44 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: docs/thrift-deprecation.md, line 31 https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/diff/2/?file=793344#file793344line31 There should be an item about logging and signaling in API responses when deprecated fields are used. Maxim Khutornenko

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Bill Farner
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: Meta question - how do you envision us using this? When a perf issue is discovered, should we generally push for a test case to be added here to validate the perf fix? Maxim Khutornenko wrote: I doubt we can build a

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 5, 2015, 8:38 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/fakes/FakeClusterState.java, line 23 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/diff/4/?file=792353#file792353line23 Did you consider using `CachedClusterState` instead? That might cause some

Re: Review Request 29117: Adding thrift API changes document.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 9, 2015, 6:44 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: docs/developing-aurora-client.md, line 124 https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/diff/2/?file=793342#file793342line124 s/thrift/Thrift/ Uppercased everywhere. On Jan. 9, 2015, 6:44 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: docs/thrift-deprecation.md,

Re: Review Request 29117: Adding thrift API changes document.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29117/ --- (Updated Jan. 21, 2015, 10:59 p.m.) Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 21, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: Meta question - how do you envision us using this? When a perf issue is discovered, should we generally push for a test case to be added here to validate the perf fix? I doubt we can build a reliable/automated way to catch regressions

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 5, 2015, 8:38 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/fakes/FakeClusterState.java, line 23 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/diff/4/?file=792353#file792353line23 Did you consider using `CachedClusterState` instead? That might cause some

Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora

2015-01-21 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28920/#review68845 --- Sorry for the delay in reply. I've been thinking a lot about this

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/ --- (Updated Jan. 22, 2015, 1:54 a.m.) Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 5, 2015, 8:38 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: src/jmh/java/org/apache/aurora/benchmark/fakes/FakeClusterState.java, line 23 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/diff/4/?file=792353#file792353line23 Did you consider using `CachedClusterState` instead? That might cause some

Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks.

2015-01-21 Thread Aurora ReviewBot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28731/#review69116 --- Master (116ee2d) is green with this patch.