---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25741/#review53708
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:15 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25741/#review53706
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David McLaughlin
On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:15 p.m
> On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:21 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> > Does removing an instance take any significant amount of time? Can it fail?
> > The concern is we'll be showing 100% progress but the update is still
> > running when reducing the instance count.
>
> Bill Farner wrote:
> Depends o
> On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:21 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> > Does removing an instance take any significant amount of time? Can it fail?
> > The concern is we'll be showing 100% progress but the update is still
> > running when reducing the instance count.
>
> Bill Farner wrote:
> Depends o
> On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:21 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> > Does removing an instance take any significant amount of time? Can it fail?
> > The concern is we'll be showing 100% progress but the update is still
> > running when reducing the instance count.
Depends on your definition of signific
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25741/#review53694
---
Does removing an instance take any significant amount of time? Can i
