Re: Review Request 23872: Fix problem with deschedule command.

2014-07-23 Thread Bill Farner

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/#review48574
---


Does this point out lack of unit test coverage, or were unit tests failing?

- Bill Farner


On July 23, 2014, 11:33 p.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 23, 2014, 11:33 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
 
 
 Bugs: aurora-597
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-597
 
 
 Repository: aurora
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Fix problem with deschedule command.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/__init__.py 
 4e5cce0796d679aa898dde7bee3cee804540c4a9 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mark Chu-Carroll
 




Re: Review Request 23872: Fix problem with deschedule command.

2014-07-23 Thread Mark Chu-Carroll
It's a bit sneaky - unit tests pass, because they mock the call to the API,
and the way that the API is implemented in Python, the usual spec mechanism
doesn't work for the thrift proxy. So the unit test couldn't catch this.

The end-to-end test should have caught it - I'm not sure why it didn't.
I'll be looking into it.

   -Mark




On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/

 Does this point out lack of unit test coverage, or were unit tests failing?


 - Bill Farner

 On July 23rd, 2014, 11:33 p.m. UTC, Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
   Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
 By Mark Chu-Carroll.

 *Updated July 23, 2014, 11:33 p.m.*
  *Bugs: * aurora-597 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-597
  *Repository: * aurora
 Description

 Fix problem with deschedule command.

   Diffs

- src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/__init__.py
(4e5cce0796d679aa898dde7bee3cee804540c4a9)

 View Diff https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/diff/



Re: Review Request 23872: Fix problem with deschedule command.

2014-07-23 Thread Bill Farner

 wired up to thrift.


The generated thrift object (AuroraAdmin.Client) has these signatures,
though, right?

-=Bill


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll mchucarr...@apache.org
wrote:

 Unfortunately, no. Because the python code that calls through thrift is
 using a dynamic invocation method - it captures calls via __getattr__, and
 then dynamically invokes them on a parameter list. There's no python object
 or class to spec - just a class with __getattr__ wired up to thrift.

-Mark


 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:

 Would mock.mocksignature help?  Seems like the biggest issue is that our
 mocks lose track of the original function signature.

 http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/mocksignature.html

 -=Bill


 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll mchucarr...@apache.org
  wrote:

 (Slight modification of one statement from the previous: end-to-end
 tests *did* catch it. The question is, why did they ever pass? )



 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll 
 mchucarr...@apache.org wrote:

 It's a bit sneaky - unit tests pass, because they mock the call to the
 API, and the way that the API is implemented in Python, the usual spec
 mechanism doesn't work for the thrift proxy. So the unit test couldn't
 catch this.

 The end-to-end test should have caught it - I'm not sure why it didn't.
 I'll be looking into it.

-Mark




 On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org
 wrote:

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/

 Does this point out lack of unit test coverage, or were unit tests 
 failing?


 - Bill Farner

 On July 23rd, 2014, 11:33 p.m. UTC, Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
   Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
 By Mark Chu-Carroll.

 *Updated July 23, 2014, 11:33 p.m.*
  *Bugs: * aurora-597
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-597
  *Repository: * aurora
 Description

 Fix problem with deschedule command.

   Diffs

- src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/__init__.py
(4e5cce0796d679aa898dde7bee3cee804540c4a9)

 View Diff https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/diff/








Re: Review Request 23872: Fix problem with deschedule command.

2014-07-23 Thread Maxim Khutornenko

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/#review48611
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Maxim Khutornenko


On July 23, 2014, 11:54 p.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 23, 2014, 11:54 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
 
 
 Bugs: aurora-597
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/aurora-597
 
 
 Repository: aurora
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Fix problem with deschedule command.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/__init__.py 
 4e5cce0796d679aa898dde7bee3cee804540c4a9 
   src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_cron.py 
 d5f57df66eab8a7113e6e9670b4bab2352d4dbf5 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23872/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mark Chu-Carroll