Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-09-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review54896 --- Discarding this since Gradle 2.1 uses HTTPS - Kevin Sweeney On

Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-30 Thread Kevin Sweeney
On July 29, 2014, 6:55 p.m., Jake Farrell wrote: +0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add overhead (especially with AURORA-616), thoughts on opening this up on the dev@ list to a wider discussion? Bill Farner wrote: +1 to hashing this out in a dev@ discussion.

Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/ --- Review request for Aurora, Jake Farrell and Bill Farner. Bugs: AURORA-620

Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-29 Thread Kevin Sweeney
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49014 --- build.gradle https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#comment85852

Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-29 Thread Bill Farner
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49015 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Bill Farner On July 29, 2014, 7:14 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-29 Thread Jake Farrell
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24063/#review49076 --- +0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add

Re: Review Request 24063: Use JCenter over HTTPS instead of Maven Central

2014-07-29 Thread Bill Farner
On July 30, 2014, 1:55 a.m., Jake Farrell wrote: +0, I dont really think that this is necessary and will add overhead (especially with AURORA-616), thoughts on opening this up on the dev@ list to a wider discussion? +1 to hashing this out in a dev@ discussion. I've had a nervous