---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/#review53860
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David McLaughlin
On Sept. 17, 2014, 8:40
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 8:37 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 8:40 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/#review53746
---
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
