---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/#review70043
---
Bill, can I get a ship it here?
- Zameer Manji
On Jan. 22, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/#review70046
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On Jan. 23, 2015, 3:32 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/#review69851
---
@ReviewBot retry
- Bill Farner
On Jan. 23, 2015, 3:32 a.m.,
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/#review69824
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 23, 2015, 3:32
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
On Jan. 23, 2015, 12:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/#review69458
---
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
On Jan. 23, 2015, 12:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Is there an ETA for the destruction of the client
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
On Jan. 23, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
I am not convinced there is enough value in this diff to risk possible
regression. Besides, the majority of what this diff touches will die out
along with the client updater.
Zameer Manji wrote:
Is there an ETA for the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30207/
---
Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Bill Farner.
Repository:
14 matches
Mail list logo
