John Russell has abandoned this change. ( http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/7983 )
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Abandoned
Suggested workaround was not a robust or future-proof
John Russell has posted comments on this change. (
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/7983 )
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2:
Let me see about looping in the original
Tim Armstrong has posted comments on this change. (
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/7983 )
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2:
If we're not going to move this forward can
Tim Armstrong has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review-1
I think that the documented solution is not the correct solution to the
I've been talking to John out of band about this. I had some more meta
concerns about documenting this and whether it will encourage customers to
do dangerous things. Need to organise my thoughts and enumerate concerns.
On 12 Sep. 2017 9:42 am, "Matthew Jacobs (Code Review)"
Matthew Jacobs has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
John Russell has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2:
Tim and Michael, I added you as reviewers based on your frequent activity in
John Russell has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
Patch Set 2:
Patch set 2 is a no-op from a review perspective. I got rid of a commit that
got into
John Russell has uploaded a new change for review.
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/7983
Change subject: [DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps
..
[DOCS] Explain Boost setting needed for 96-bit timestamps