[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-721564636 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [9 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.1% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-721537919 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [13 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.1% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] wc188996 commented on issue #748: Welcome to leave your company's info if your company are using/testing IoTDB(欢迎使用/测试IoTDB的公司在此登记)
wc188996 commented on issue #748: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/748#issuecomment-721555249 太极计算机股份有限公司 企业BG 基础能源SBU 准备 测试性能 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1941: [To rel/0.11] Check unclosed old files before upgrading to 0.11
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1941: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1941#issuecomment-721541225 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1941=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-721501653 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [2 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [16 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-721537919 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [13 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.1% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1940: Check unclosed old files before upgrading to 0.11
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1940: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1940#issuecomment-721537475 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1940=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou opened a new pull request #1941: [To rel/0.11] Check unclosed old files before upgrading to 0.11
HTHou opened a new pull request #1941: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1941 1. When upgrading v0.10 to v0.11, if there are some unclosed TsFiles existed, shutdown the IoTDB instance and tell users to close those TsFiles first. 2. If users are upgrading IoTDB from v0.9 or lower version to v0.11, shutdown the IoTDB instance too and tell them to upgrade v0.10 before upgrading v0.11. 3. Upgrade system.properties if needed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou opened a new pull request #1940: Check unclosed old files before upgrading to 0.11
HTHou opened a new pull request #1940: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1940 1. When upgrading v0.10 to v0.11, if there are some unclosed TsFiles existed, shutdown the IoTDB instance and tell users to close those TsFiles first. 2. If users are upgrading IoTDB from v0.9 or lower version to v0.11, shutdown the IoTDB instance too and tell them to upgrade v0.10 before upgrading v0.11. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-721501653 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [2 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [16 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-720321254 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [2 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [15 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1929: Fix tsfile resource upgrade error [0.10 - 0.11]
qiaojialin merged pull request #1929: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1929 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1939: refactor the packaging structure of Python API module on Pypi
qiaojialin merged pull request #1939: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1939 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jixuan1989 opened a new pull request #1939: refactor the packaging structure of Python API module on Pypi
jixuan1989 opened a new pull request #1939: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1939 v0.10.* did not pack session.py to Pypi. To make everything automatically, I refactor the project structure: 1. move pypi description files to `client-py` module; 2. use maven to copy all generated files to `client-py/target/pypi` Then we just need to run `python setup.py sdist bdist_wheel` and `twine upload --repository pypi dist/*` manually. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jixuan1989 merged pull request #1938: Python session time zone example
jixuan1989 merged pull request #1938: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1938 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] SilverNarcissus opened a new pull request #1938: Python session time zone example
SilverNarcissus opened a new pull request #1938: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1938 add an example in sessionExample.py This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jixuan1989 merged pull request #1937: Fix time zone in python session
jixuan1989 merged pull request #1937: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1937 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] SilverNarcissus opened a new pull request #1937: Fix time zone in python session
SilverNarcissus opened a new pull request #1937: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1937 Fix time zone in python session This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1930: remove hot compaction read limiter
qiaojialin merged pull request #1930: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1930 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou merged pull request #1935: [IOTDB-868] Can not redo mlogs with special characters like comma
HTHou merged pull request #1935: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1935 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1936: add release note 0.11
qiaojialin merged pull request #1936: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1936 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1936: add release note 0.11
qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1936: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1936 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] JackieTien97 opened a new pull request #1935: [IOTDB-868] Can not redo mlogs with special characters like comma
JackieTien97 opened a new pull request #1935: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1935 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin closed pull request #1864: [dev] add merge datatype error log
qiaojialin closed pull request #1864: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1864 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin commented on pull request #1841: change tsfile_manage_strategy default LEVEL_STRATEGY
qiaojialin commented on pull request #1841: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1841#issuecomment-721265751 duplicated with https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1930 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin closed pull request #1841: change tsfile_manage_strategy default LEVEL_STRATEGY
qiaojialin closed pull request #1841: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1841 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin edited a comment on pull request #1924: change travis.yml
qiaojialin edited a comment on pull request #1924: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1924#issuecomment-721264657 You can do this from travis  This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin commented on pull request #1924: change travis.yml
qiaojialin commented on pull request #1924: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1924#issuecomment-721264657 You can do this by from travis  This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin closed pull request #1924: change travis.yml
qiaojialin closed pull request #1924: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1924 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1934: add docker file for 0.11
qiaojialin merged pull request #1934: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1934 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1932: remove useless line to fix a code smell
qiaojialin merged pull request #1932: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1932 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1933: add changelists folder in server module
qiaojialin merged pull request #1933: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1933 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1927: More precise fetch size on query while calculating query memory footprint
qiaojialin merged pull request #1927: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1927 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1933: add changelists folder in server module
qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1933: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1933 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1928: fix hot compaction recover
qiaojialin merged pull request #1928: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1928 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1931: Enhance TsFileResource deserialize compatibility
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1931: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1931#issuecomment-721252348 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1931=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin closed pull request #1931: Enhance TsFileResource deserialize compatibility
qiaojialin closed pull request #1931: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1931 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin commented on pull request #1931: Enhance TsFileResource deserialize compatibility
qiaojialin commented on pull request #1931: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1931#issuecomment-721251795 -1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou merged pull request #1926: update AbstractCli
HTHou merged pull request #1926: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1926 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1927: More precise fetch size on query while calculating query memory footprint
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1927: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1927#issuecomment-721119146 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1927: More precise fetch size on query while calculating query memory footprint
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1927: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1927#issuecomment-721247951 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1929: Fix tsfile resource upgrade error [0.10 - 0.11]
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1929: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1929#issuecomment-721227083 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1929=duplicated_lines_density=list) No Duplication information The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou opened a new pull request #1932: remove useless line to fix a code smell
HTHou opened a new pull request #1932: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1932 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
qiaojialin merged pull request #1524: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] zhanglingzhe0820 opened a new pull request #1930: remove hot compaction read limiter
zhanglingzhe0820 opened a new pull request #1930: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1930 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1524: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524#issuecomment-721159781 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [6 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [2.5% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1524: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524#issuecomment-720917146 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [8 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [2.8% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1524=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1927: More precise fetch size on query while calculating query memory footprint
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1927: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1927#issuecomment-721119146 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1927=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] zhanglingzhe0820 opened a new pull request #1928: fix hot compaction recover
zhanglingzhe0820 opened a new pull request #1928: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1928 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jixuan1989 commented on pull request #1890: Finish DIFF encoding algorithm which is reserved in enum before
jixuan1989 commented on pull request #1890: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1890#issuecomment-720874325 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jt2594838 merged pull request #1894: limit log size of logDispatcher
jt2594838 merged pull request #1894: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1894 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] CRZbulabula closed pull request #1925: Fix bug abstract cli
CRZbulabula closed pull request #1925: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1925 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1920: [IOTDB-975] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1920: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1920#issuecomment-720575554 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1716: Restful API v2 (using netty)
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1716: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1716#issuecomment-714861181 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jixuan1989 opened a new pull request #1921: add solution for network broken when downloading thrift files from github
jixuan1989 opened a new pull request #1921: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1921 just some documents. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1926: update AbstractCli
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1926: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1926#issuecomment-721115264 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1926=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] samperson1997 opened a new pull request #1920: [IOTDB-975] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
samperson1997 opened a new pull request #1920: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1920 See PR #1919 . This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] EJTTianYu opened a new pull request #1924: change travis.yml
EJTTianYu opened a new pull request #1924: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1924 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] JackieTien97 commented on issue #1833: I want to know the detail design for tag inverted index
JackieTien97 commented on issue #1833: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/1833#issuecomment-721052984 > thank you for your detailed description! > > from your comment above, and the system design article in iotdb official website, I think you do great job with the timeseries data format to achieve the best compression ratio and query performance. but I still doubt whether the tag index design now could work well: > > * tag index just a hashmap, it could mean lots of potential probelm, if multi timeseries created, all of them should wait the write lock, it's a concurrency write performance. > * If query series device by sequence, hashmap couldn't do well in such situation. > * have you test the performance when large number devices write to db, such as billiion devices, it may face many times of hashmap expansion. and so the query performance include where clause. > * all index saved in memory may lead to system unstable and need expensive machine. influxdb in older version save tag index all in memory, seems a bad attemp(although now they still do bad, too). also it mean mmanger component need lots of memory. for now iotdb seems doesn't implement a distributed program, this more worst. > * I guess when device quantity increase to a big number, it would take lots of time for iotdb to restart and recover. > * and so on. > > in our tsdb maintain experience, tag index is a very important part, develpoer & user should design and use it carefully. for example, if user write a tag with long text string, it could cause index use more mem, and drop down system availability. > > our company have now billion device, we are planning to test tdengine & iotdb to verify whether they could meet our requirement. tdengine programmed by c, it's little hard for us to maintain it, and iotdb seems have some problem too(not distributed system, seems simple index). > > If you have any advice, please tell us, thanks! > > 顺便问下能不能直接和你们的开发人员沟通。我看你们github回复有点慢， apache mail list也不咋活跃，官网上提到有钉钉，但是我不想用钉钉。。 确实是的，我们目前对于时间序列的tag的倒排索引的实现比较native，在大数据量情况下会有问题。 BTW，我们的分布式版本也正在内测阶段，在cluster_new分支，也有相应的设计文档，您可以在对应分支看到。 我的微信号是JackieTien，有什么疑问，微信响应的快一些。 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] SteveYurongSu opened a new pull request #1913: [IOTDB-971] More precise error messages of slimit and soffset
SteveYurongSu opened a new pull request #1913: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1913 JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-971 ``` IoTDB> select count from root.group_0.d_0 slimit 10 soffset 10 Msg: 500: toIndex = 20 IoTDB> select count from root.group_0 slimit 10 soffset 10 Msg: 411: Meet error in query process: SOFFSET : SOFFSETValue exceeds the range. ``` > The result from the first example makes little sense to users, and I think it is probably not right even, since there are 100 measurements for each device. I think the bug has already been fixed by my PR #1884. Please check whether the problem can be reproduced on master branch before merging this PR. I added some tests for the scenario in this PR. --- > The second result is also confusing, "root.group_0" does not exist and that should be the root cause. I made the error messages more precise in this PR. Users will know how many time series that the original data set contains when the slimit error occurs. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jt2594838 merged pull request #1865: [IOTDB-915]Add raft log persist mechanism and use persist log to catch up
jt2594838 merged pull request #1865: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1865 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1913: [IOTDB-971] More precise error messages of slimit and soffset
qiaojialin merged pull request #1913: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1913 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1916: Remove mqtt log and add InsertRowPlan check
qiaojialin merged pull request #1916: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1916 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1916: Remove mqtt log and add InsertRowPlan check
qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1916: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1916 In an on-line IoTDB, there is a lot of MQTT log, which causes much trouble. 2020-10-10 00:00:48,121 [nioEventLoopGroup-3-16] INFO io.moquette.broker.metrics.MQTTMessageLogger:92 - C<-B PUBACK <1> packetID <62818> Besides, the measurements is null, we need to add a check 2020-06-08 15:53:11,507 [pool-4-thread-2] ERROR org.apache.iotdb.db.concurrent.IoTDBDefaultThreadExceptionHandler:31 - Exception in thread pool-4-thread-2-35 java.lang.NullPointerException: null at org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.insert(PlanExecutor.java:891) at org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processNonQuery(PlanExecutor.java:200) at org.apache.iotdb.db.mqtt.PublishHandler.executeNonQuery(PublishHandler.java:116) at org.apache.iotdb.db.mqtt.PublishHandler.onPublish(PublishHandler.java:99) at io.moquette.interception.BrokerInterceptor.lambda$notifyTopicPublished$3(BrokerInterceptor.java:133) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1920: [IOTDB-975] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
qiaojialin merged pull request #1920: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1920 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1919: [IOTDB-975] [To rel/0.10] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1919: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1919#issuecomment-720549921 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #460: [IOTDB-68] New shared-nothing cluster
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #460: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/460#issuecomment-720284638 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou commented on a change in pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
HTHou commented on a change in pull request #1524: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524#discussion_r515760463 ## File path: server/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-engine.properties ## @@ -218,28 +218,35 @@ mtree_snapshot_threshold_time=3600 ### Memory Control Configuration -# This adapter could adjust the system memory to avoid OOM. -# It will refuse to create time series or add storage groups under high system load. -# -# Attention!!! -# If disable this parameter, you need to set some parameters according to your system load: -# Normal scenario: 1-50 storage groups. <100k devices, <10M time series -# memtable_size_threshold = tsfile_size_threshold = IoTDB memory allocation in byte / 2 / num of storage group / 4 -# Make sure the total num of time series in system * primitive_array_size * 16 <= IoTDB memory allocation in byte / 2 / 4 -# you could reduce the primitive_array_size in very high workload. -enable_parameter_adapter=true - -# Memory Allocation Ratio: Write, Read, and Free Memory. -# The parameter form is a:b:c, where a, b and c are integers. for example: 1:1:1 , 6:3:1 -write_read_free_memory_proportion=6:3:1 +# Whether to enable memory control +enable_mem_control=true + +# Memory Allocation Ratio: Write, Read, Schema and Free Memory. +# The parameter form is a:b:c:d, where a, b, c and d are integers. for example: 1:1:1:1 , 6:2:1:1 +write_read_schema_free_memory_proportion=4:3:1:2 # primitive array size (length of each array) in array pool primitive_array_size=128 +# Ratio of memory allocated for buffered arrays, 0.8 by default +buffered_arrays_memory_proportion=0.8 Review comment: 0.8 of write memory ## File path: server/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-engine.properties ## @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ tsfile_size_threshold=536870912 # When a memTable's size (in byte) exceeds this, the memtable is flushed to disk. The default threshold is 1 GB. memtable_size_threshold=1073741824 -avg_series_point_number_threshold=10 +avg_series_point_number_threshold=1 Review comment: sure ## File path: server/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-engine.properties ## @@ -218,28 +218,35 @@ mtree_snapshot_threshold_time=3600 ### Memory Control Configuration -# This adapter could adjust the system memory to avoid OOM. -# It will refuse to create time series or add storage groups under high system load. -# -# Attention!!! -# If disable this parameter, you need to set some parameters according to your system load: -# Normal scenario: 1-50 storage groups. <100k devices, <10M time series -# memtable_size_threshold = tsfile_size_threshold = IoTDB memory allocation in byte / 2 / num of storage group / 4 -# Make sure the total num of time series in system * primitive_array_size * 16 <= IoTDB memory allocation in byte / 2 / 4 -# you could reduce the primitive_array_size in very high workload. -enable_parameter_adapter=true - -# Memory Allocation Ratio: Write, Read, and Free Memory. -# The parameter form is a:b:c, where a, b and c are integers. for example: 1:1:1 , 6:3:1 -write_read_free_memory_proportion=6:3:1 +# Whether to enable memory control +enable_mem_control=true + +# Memory Allocation Ratio: Write, Read, Schema and Free Memory. +# The parameter form is a:b:c:d, where a, b, c and d are integers. for example: 1:1:1:1 , 6:2:1:1 +write_read_schema_free_memory_proportion=4:3:1:2 # primitive array size (length of each array) in array pool primitive_array_size=128 +# Ratio of memory allocated for buffered arrays, 0.8 by default +buffered_arrays_memory_proportion=0.8 + +# Flush proportion for system, 0.3 by default +flush_proportion=0.3 + +# Reject proportion for system, 0.8 by default +reject_proportion=0.8 + +# If storage group increased more than this threshold, report to system. The default value is 16MB +storage_group_report_threshold=16777216 + # allowed max numbers of deduplicated path in one query # it's just an advised value, the real limitation will be the smaller one between this and the one we calculated max_deduplicated_path_num=1000 +# estimated metadata size of one timeseries in Mtree +estimated_series_size=300 Review comment: Fixed ## File path: server/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-engine.properties ## @@ -218,28 +218,35 @@ mtree_snapshot_threshold_time=3600 ### Memory Control Configuration -# This adapter could adjust the system memory to avoid OOM. -# It will refuse to create time series or add storage groups under high system load. -# -# Attention!!! -# If disable this parameter, you need to set some parameters according to your system load: -# Normal scenario: 1-50 storage groups. <100k devices, <10M time series -# memtable_size_threshold = tsfile_size_threshold = IoTDB memory allocation in byte / 2 / num of storage group / 4 -# Make sure the total num of time series in system *
[GitHub] [iotdb] jt2594838 commented on pull request #1865: [IOTDB-915]Add raft log persist mechanism and use persist log to catch up
jt2594838 commented on pull request #1865: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1865#issuecomment-72084 It seems we got compilation error. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1919: [IOTDB-975] [To rel/0.10] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1919: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1919#issuecomment-720549921 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1912: add debug SQL log
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1912: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1912#issuecomment-720253725 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1912: add debug SQL log
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1912: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1912#issuecomment-720253725 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1926: update AbstractCli
qiaojialin opened a new pull request #1926: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1926 https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1908 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1915: Fix Pull Request #1908 CI Problem
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1915: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1915#issuecomment-720479076 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] Ring-k opened a new pull request #1915: Fix Pull Request #1908 CI Problem
Ring-k opened a new pull request #1915: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1915 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] JackieTien97 opened a new pull request #1927: More precise fetch size on query while calculating query memory footprint
JackieTien97 opened a new pull request #1927: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1927 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] samperson1997 opened a new pull request #1919: Jira 975
samperson1997 opened a new pull request #1919: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1919 Fix reading file error in `getChunkMetadataList`, which is caused by `binarySearchInChildren` This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1910: check exception when insert tablet
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1910: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1910#issuecomment-720204674 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [53.8% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou merged pull request #1919: [IOTDB-975] [To rel/0.10] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
HTHou merged pull request #1919: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1919 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] HTHou merged pull request #1908: [IOTDB-973] fix bug when start-cli with -e parameter
HTHou merged pull request #1908: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1908 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] wshao08 opened a new pull request #1917: Add restrictions for LAST query filter
wshao08 opened a new pull request #1917: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1917 Considering performance, we only support '>' or '>=' in LAST query time filter currently. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1924: change travis.yml
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1924: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1924#issuecomment-721010248 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1924=duplicated_lines_density=list) No Duplication information The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] CRZbulabula opened a new pull request #1925: Fix bug abstract cli
CRZbulabula opened a new pull request #1925: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1925 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: [IOTDB-937] change jdbc into session and don't need to create metadata
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1914: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1914#issuecomment-720321254 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [2 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [15 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [1.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1914=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jt2594838 merged pull request #1922: [Distributed] Fix catchup judgement during leadership transfer
jt2594838 merged pull request #1922: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1922 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] jt2594838 merged pull request #1910: check exception when insert tablet
jt2594838 merged pull request #1910: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1910 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1524: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524#issuecomment-720225301 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] JackieTien97 commented on a change in pull request #1917: Add restrictions for LAST query filter
JackieTien97 commented on a change in pull request #1917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1917#discussion_r515956741
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/query/executor/LastQueryExecutor.java
##
@@ -145,13 +145,17 @@ public static TimeValuePair
calculateLastPairForOneSeriesLocally(
TimeValuePair timeValuePair =
IoTDB.metaManager.getLastCache(seriesPath);
if (timeValuePair != null && satisfyFilter(filter, timeValuePair)) {
return timeValuePair;
+} else if (timeValuePair != null) {
+ return null;
}
}
if (node != null && node.getCachedLast() != null) {
TimeValuePair timeValuePair = node.getCachedLast();
if (timeValuePair != null && satisfyFilter(filter, timeValuePair)) {
return timeValuePair;
+} else if (timeValuePair != null) {
+ return null;
Review comment:
If the cached last time-value pair doesn't satify the filter, shouldn't
we keep to call the calculateLastPairByScanningTsFiles() function?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] LebronAl opened a new pull request #1922: [Distributed] Fix catchup judgement during leadership transfer
LebronAl opened a new pull request #1922: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1922 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1918: Add more query log
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1918: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1918#issuecomment-720492358 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1917: Add restrictions for LAST query filter
qiaojialin merged pull request #1917: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1917 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1911: update vue to 1.7.1 and fix shell render name in markdowns
qiaojialin merged pull request #1911: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1911 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1910: check exception when insert tablet
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1910: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1910#issuecomment-720432519 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [70.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1910=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1916: Remove mqtt log and add InsertRowPlan check
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #1916: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1916#issuecomment-720407601 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=CODE_SMELL) [1 Code Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1916=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin commented on issue #1903: 是否有方法可以按月（每个月实际天数非30天）聚合数据？
qiaojialin commented on issue #1903: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues/1903#issuecomment-720880381 感谢反馈，这个功能我们之后加一下，按照自然月聚合 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] LebronAl opened a new pull request #1923: [Distributed] Fix thrift NPE caused by null alias
LebronAl opened a new pull request #1923: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1923 Solution: use "" rather than `null` to represent `there is no alias` This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin merged pull request #1912: add debug SQL log
qiaojialin merged pull request #1912: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1912 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] qiaojialin commented on a change in pull request #1524: [IOTDB-776] Control the memory usage of flushing the memtable
qiaojialin commented on a change in pull request #1524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1524#discussion_r515754171
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/engine/storagegroup/StorageGroupInfo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup;
+
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
+
+import org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor;
+import org.apache.iotdb.db.rescon.SystemInfo;
+
+/**
+ * The storageGroupInfo records the total memory cost of the Storage Group.
+ */
+public class StorageGroupInfo {
+
+ private StorageGroupProcessor storageGroupProcessor;
+
+ /**
+ * The total Storage group memory cost
+ */
+ private AtomicLong memTableCost;
Review comment:
memoryCost
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/engine/storagegroup/StorageGroupInfo.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup;
+
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
+
+import org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor;
+import org.apache.iotdb.db.rescon.SystemInfo;
+
+/**
+ * The storageGroupInfo records the total memory cost of the Storage Group.
+ */
+public class StorageGroupInfo {
+
+ private StorageGroupProcessor storageGroupProcessor;
+
+ /**
+ * The total Storage group memory cost
+ */
+ private AtomicLong memTableCost;
+
+ /**
+ * The threshold of reporting it's size to SystemInfo
+ */
+ private long storageGroupSizeReportThreshold =
+
IoTDBDescriptor.getInstance().getConfig().getStorageGroupSizeReportThreshold();
+
+ private long lastReportedSize = 0L;
+
+ /**
+ * A set of all unclosed TsFileProcessors in this SG
+ */
+ private Set reportedTsps = new HashSet<>();
+
+ public StorageGroupInfo(StorageGroupProcessor storageGroupProcessor) {
+this.storageGroupProcessor = storageGroupProcessor;
+memTableCost = new AtomicLong();
+ }
+
+ public StorageGroupProcessor getStorageGroupProcessor() {
+return storageGroupProcessor;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * When create a new TsFileProcessor, call this method to report it
+ */
+ public void reportTsFileProcessorInfo(TsFileProcessor tsFileProcessor) {
Review comment:
```suggestion
public void initTsFileProcessorInfo(TsFileProcessor tsFileProcessor) {
```
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/engine/memtable/AbstractMemTable.java
##
@@ -159,6 +171,21 @@ public void write(InsertTabletPlan insertTabletPlan, int
start, int end) {
}
}
+ @Override
+ public boolean checkIfNeedStartNewChunk(String deviceId, String measurement)
{
Review comment:
```suggestion
public boolean checkIfChunkExist(String deviceId, String measurement) {
```
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/engine/memtable/AbstractMemTable.java
##
@@ -159,6 +171,21 @@ public void write(InsertTabletPlan insertTabletPlan, int
start, int end) {
}
}
+ @Override
+ public boolean checkIfNeedStartNewChunk(String deviceId, String measurement)
{
Review comment:
```suggestion
public boolean checkIfChunkDoesNotExist(String deviceId, String
measurement) {
```
##
File path:
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1918: Add more query log
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1918: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1918#issuecomment-720492358 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=VULNERABILITY) (and [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/i ssues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) to review) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=CODE_SMELL) [16 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_incubator-iotdb=1918=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) The version of Java (1.8.0_252) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it accepting it soon.Please update to at least Java 11. Read more [here](https://sonarcloud.io/documentation/upcoming/) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [iotdb] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1920: [IOTDB-975] Fix reading file error in getChunkMetadataList
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #1920: URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/1920#issuecomment-720575554 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
