Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-11-23 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Nov. 23, 2015, 1:05 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-11-23 Thread Benjamin Hindman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/#review107591 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Benjamin Hindman On Nov. 23, 2015, 1:05

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-11-18 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Nov. 18, 2015, 4:05 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-11-09 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Nov. 9, 2015, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-27 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Oct. 27, 2015, 10:45 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-26 Thread Alexander Rukletsov
> On Oct. 24, 2015, 7:23 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > What about `.proto` files? > > Benjamin Bannier wrote: > Good point, since they contain C++ embedded they should follow a similar > style. I pushed an updated RR. > > Most files follow that format; I cross-checked with

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-25 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Oct. 25, 2015, 2:49 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-25 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Oct. 24, 2015, 7:23 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote: > > What about `.proto` files? Good point, since they contain C++ embedded they should follow a similar style. I pushed an updated RR. Most files follow that format; I cross-checked with a WIP linter check,

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-24 Thread Alexander Rukletsov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/#review103903 --- What about `.proto` files? - Alexander Rukletsov On Oct. 24,

Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-23 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Bernd Mathiske, and Till

Re: Review Request 39590: Made license-headers doxygen-compatible.

2015-10-23 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39590/ --- (Updated Oct. 24, 2015, 12:06 a.m.) Review request for mesos, Alexander