> On March 31, 2016, 2:10 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > This could break existing clients which include extra whitespace, though it
> > does seem that RFC-7230 specifically prohibits whitespace in that location.
> > I wonder if a deprecation cycle is advisable for this change?
> >
> > Also, it's
> On March 30, 2016, 6:10 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> > This could break existing clients which include extra whitespace, though it
> > does seem that RFC-7230 specifically prohibits whitespace in that location.
> > I wonder if a deprecation cycle is advisable for this change?
> >
> > Also, it's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/#review126160
---
This could break existing clients which include extra whitespace,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/#review126158
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On March 30, 2016, 5:35
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/#review126065
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [45471]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/
---
(Updated March 30, 2016, 1:35 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Greg Mann and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/
---
(Updated March 30, 2016, 1:33 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Greg Mann and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45471/
---
Review request for mesos, Greg Mann and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-4805
