> On April 13, 2016, 5:11 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
> > crucial.
>
> Qian Zhang wrote:
> Sure, I will update slave recovery tests soon. Just want to double
> confirm, in `slave_recovery_tests.cpp`, I see there are t
> On April 12, 2016, 9:11 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
> > crucial.
>
> Qian Zhang wrote:
> Sure, I will update slave recovery tests soon. Just want to double
> confirm, in `slave_recovery_tests.cpp`, I see there are t
Anand might have ideas. If we can get its os pid we could do kill on it?
@vinodkone
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Qian Zhang wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On April 13, 2016, 5:11 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
>>> Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
>>> crucial.
>>
>> Qian
> On April 13, 2016, 5:11 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
> > crucial.
>
> Qian Zhang wrote:
> Sure, I will update slave recovery tests soon. Just want to double
> confirm, in `slave_recovery_tests.cpp`, I see there are t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45670/#review128787
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Vinod Kone
On April 13, 2016, 9:15 a.m.,
> On April 12, 2016, 9:11 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
> > crucial.
>
> Qian Zhang wrote:
> Sure, I will update slave recovery tests soon. Just want to double
> confirm, in `slave_recovery_tests.cpp`, I see there are t
> On April 13, 2016, 5:11 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Are you also planning to update slave recovery tests? Those are the most
> > crucial.
Sure, I will update slave recovery tests soon. Just want to double confirm, in
`slave_recovery_tests.cpp`, I see there are two TODOs related to HTTP based
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45670/#review128658
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [45670, 44427, 44424, 44423]
Failed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45670/
---
(Updated April 13, 2016, 5:15 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar an