---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47990/#review135654
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp (line 4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47990/
---
(Updated May 30, 2016, 11:21 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, M
> On May 29, 2016, 4:46 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > what's the reason for not having a rvalue ref overload?
I discussed this with mpark and we agreed that for sink arguments, just passing
by value is good enough for movable types like `std::string`. This incurs the
extra overhead of one move f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47990/#review135416
---
what's the reason for not having a rvalue ref overload?
- Vinod K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47990/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Michael Park, and Vinod Kone.
Reposi
