> On July 21, 2016, 12:08 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > If we are not interested in rescinding, can't we simply say something like
> > ```
> > EXPECT_CALL(sched, offerRescinded(, _))
> > .WillRepeatedly(Return());
> > ```
We could -- I felt like there was value in being a bit more
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50186/#review143077
---
If we are not interested in rescinding, can't we simply say
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50186/#review142746
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [50186]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50186/
---
(Updated July 19, 2016, 9:55 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Alexander
