Re: Review Request 63767: Added a missing protobuf field to the unversioned definitions.

2017-11-14 Thread Gaston Kleiman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63767/#review190999 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Gaston Kleiman On Nov. 13, 2017, 3:17

Re: Review Request 63767: Added a missing protobuf field to the unversioned definitions.

2017-11-14 Thread Jan Schlicht
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63767/#review190923 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jan Schlicht On Nov. 14, 2017, 12:17

Re: Review Request 63767: Added a missing protobuf field to the unversioned definitions.

2017-11-13 Thread Jie Yu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63767/#review190907 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jie Yu On Nov. 13, 2017, 11:17 p.m.,

Review Request 63767: Added a missing protobuf field to the unversioned definitions.

2017-11-13 Thread Greg Mann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63767/ --- Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier, Gaston Kleiman, Jie Yu, and Jan