---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68145/#review207345
---
include/mesos/resource_provider/resource_provider.proto
Lines 42
> On Aug. 15, 2018, 12:04 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> > I'm not sure if we want to have this. If we are to follow the same pattern
> > as `MARK_AGENT_GONE`, shouldn't the manager just disconnects the resource
> > provider and prevents future registration?
>
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68145/#review207335
---
FAIL: Some of the unit tests failed. Please check the relevant
> On Aug. 15, 2018, 2:04 a.m., Chun-Hung Hsiao wrote:
> > I'm not sure if we want to have this. If we are to follow the same pattern
> > as `MARK_AGENT_GONE`, shouldn't the manager just disconnects the resource
> > provider and prevents future registration?
Removed from the MESOS-8403 chain.
