Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-22 Thread Mesos Reviewbot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review218760 --- Bad review! Reviews applied: [71741, 71739, 71725, 71729]

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-22 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Nov. 20, 2019, 3:41 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > docs/operator-http-api.md > > Line 1870 (original), 1872 (patched) > > > > > > Maybe ask a native speaker for a second opinion, but "takes" sounds a > > bit

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-22 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/ --- (Updated Nov. 22, 2019, 12:55 p.m.) Review request for mesos and Benno Evers.

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-20 Thread Mesos Reviewbot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review218724 --- Bad review! Reviews applied: [71741, 71739, 71725, 71729]

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-20 Thread Benno Evers
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review218721 --- Fix it, then Ship it! docs/operator-http-api.md Lines 1869

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-20 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/ --- (Updated Nov. 20, 2019, 3:17 p.m.) Review request for mesos and Benno Evers.

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-19 Thread Benjamin Bannier
> On Nov. 18, 2019, 5:41 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > I'm not sure that this example does much to explain the semantics of the > > `RESERVE_RESOURCES` call to unsuspecting readers: The example you modify > > will behave exactly the same whether the `source` field is present or not. > > > > At

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-18 Thread Benno Evers
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review218664 --- I'm not sure that this example does much to explain the semantics

Re: Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-08 Thread Mesos Reviewbot
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review218580 --- Bad review! Reviews applied: [71741, 71739, 71725, 71729]

Review Request 71741: Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.

2019-11-08 Thread Benjamin Bannier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/ --- Review request for mesos and Benno Evers. Bugs: MESOS-9993