> On May 6, 2020, 5:52 p.m., Andrei Sekretenko wrote:
> > As 1.10 release is near, I have landed this into master (cannot close the
> > PR as "submitted").
> >
> > Sumbission:
> >
> > commit 83359534cb1b3303fcbae34af3fadd81b7c8cb85
> > A
building against
unbundled dependencies and depending on custom behavior makes that impossible.
My hunch would be to not make functional changes like the one in this patch to
dependencies (changes for building are usually fine).
- Benjamin Bannier
On Feb. 25, 2020, 2:07 vorm., Qian Zhang wrote
).
- Benjamin Bannier
On Feb. 11, 2020, 5:38 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
Could we instead just perform the escaping inside the loop above where we
already perform some escaping? You could even introduce a small helper if you
wanted.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Feb. 11, 2020, 9:54 a.m., Gre
/
Testing
---
`make check` macos/Linux; `make tests` msvc
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
/
Testing
---
Successfully ran a dummy verify-reviews session.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
. Please find a reviewer by asking on JIRA or the mailing
list.
- Benjamin Bannier
On June 18, 2018, 3:52 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
f needed.
Just got rid of this comment.
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71421/#review219383
---
On Sept. 2, 2
eb31a0f93d21ef859684c26a99effde08348ead6
src/tests/mock_slave.cpp 4940285b183a9513701e616e7d7523801daf113b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72035/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72035/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
-------
On Jan. 22, 2020, 1:46 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72035/
> -
/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
0005971717f5b90da368b45caad8e209ada95fa5
src/slave/state.hpp 6d6ae0168ae1e4c999a099c0505344dac2fac71c
src/slave/state.cpp 821132ba81c955714db2e809cca764262997639a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72034/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
generate for command tasks.
Diffs
-
src/slave/slave.cpp 0005971717f5b90da368b45caad8e209ada95fa5
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72033/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
4940285b183a9513701e616e7d7523801daf113b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72035/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
/backends/copy.cpp
4afef7f75092067caac35459805d670a9651afa0
src/slave/gc.cpp 450bbef66e317a403d566bb0ac5ccf5fb0d2329e
src/tests/sorter_tests.cpp 472691d1aba9d476bf0cf35ca82106d880cdc415
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72011/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 53a7b9bc6190d826868a1633c11c9a0ecf9acf0a
src/master/validation.cpp d628bb3443b32acac38e29a15a49be688b35b8b3
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72002/diff/3/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72002/diff/2-3/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin
://reviews.apache.org/r/72002/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72002/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
`ExecutorInfo` of a task does not have
> > `generated_by_agent` set, maybe we can at least forcibly clear it? either
> > here or in `Slave::runTask()`, and document (in the previous patch) that
> > agent **ignores** this field when received from outside?
>
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
--------
On Jan. 15, 2020, 4:12 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72003/
> --
0005971717f5b90da368b45caad8e209ada95fa5
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72003/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72003/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
I added another `CHECK_NOTNULL` here.
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72003/#review219270
---
On Jan. 15, 2020
://reviews.apache.org/r/72003/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
53a7b9bc6190d826868a1633c11c9a0ecf9acf0a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72002/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
/containerizer/io_switchboard_tests.cpp
1b347eb5e86d310e2404be30947f74774f1b0ace
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71996/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
filter.
Diffs
-
src/tests/default_executor_tests.cpp 6c71b3c2231d3da77d2fb793cb2bbc38e02cef24
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71987/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check` on macos
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
these lines anymore
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
Since `Try` does not have a default constructor we need to provide a
dummy value.
Diffs
-
src/slave/main.cpp 9e40743a9d379d5b1ff9f97372826d4296167ce3
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71985/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check` on macos
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71977/#comment307382>
Outdated `todo`?
src/slave/main.cpp
Lines 653 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71977/#comment307383>
This can be simplified to `socketFds->size() == 1`.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:48 a.m., Be
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/71816/#comment307381>
Let's also document these flags in `docs/configuration/agent.md`.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:43 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
l from multiple threads since it mutates env?
src/linux/systemd.cpp
Lines 460-462 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71976/#comment307379>
Let's use `os::unsetenv` for "consistency".
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:48 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> --
).
src/tests/cluster.cpp
Lines 614 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71833/#comment307335>
Init with `None`.
src/tests/cluster.cpp
Lines 618 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71833/#comment307334>
`CHECK_SOME`
-
sewhere here as well.
src/slave/slave.cpp
Lines 11095 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71816/#comment307324>
Ditto.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:43 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an aut
iews.apache.org/r/71816/#comment307321>
Ditto.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:43 a.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http
che.org/r/71815/#comment307318>
These flags are only present and active later in the chain. If you have
time you could reorder the patches so we get a clean bisect, but I don't think
that this is critical.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:42 a.m., Benno
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71814/#review219208
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Dec. 3, 2019, 7:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71947/#review219207
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 10, 2020, 2:37
> On Jan. 6, 2020, 1:59 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp
> > Line 232 (original), 247 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71947/diff/1/?file=2191675#file2191675line247>
> >
> > For unnamed sock
> On Jan. 8, 2020, 2:28 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/attributes.hpp
> > Lines 52 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71971/diff/1/?file=2199431#file2199431line53>
> >
> > This makes `STOUT_DEPRECATED` a
This makes `STOUT_DEPRECATED` a noop on all current clang versions. We
could add another `TODO` here to figure out what until which release clang
emitted the warning (I did not see it with clang-10.0.0).
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 8, 2020, 1:15 p.m., Benno
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71961/#review219142
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 7, 2020, 1:24
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71960/#review219141
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Jan. 7, 2020, 1:24
disable-nvml`?
Good idea!
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71538/#review219132
---
On Jan. 6,
rg/r/71538/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71538/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
* tested toggle both ways in cmake and autotools build
* wasn't able to test test filter since I don't seem to have access to a dev
machine with GPUs
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
://reviews.apache.org/r/71717/diff/1/
Testing
---
* `make tests`
* `make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
hpp
Lines 318 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71947/#comment307230>
Does it make sense to pass an `Option` defaulted to `None` to
make it clearer that `length` is only interesting in certain cases?
In any case we need to do add documentation on the semantics of the
parameters.
- B
Description
---
This addresses CVE-2019-16782 which should not affect us.
Diffs
-
site/Gemfile.lock 87d825c4e4056c33e0702b3c429a48b01cc1b035
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71934/diff/1/
Testing
---
Confirmed that the website still builds.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
enabled
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
/path_tests.cpp 19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71882/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71882/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
> > the range `[base.begin(), base.end())`
> >
> > to avoid the awkward backtick-single-quote?
Went with your first suggestion.
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated
3rdparty/stout/tests/path_tests.cpp 19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71878/diff/3/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71878/diff/2-3/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
2150#file2182150line469>
> >
> > I don't completely understand why we need a sentinel, isn't
> > `path->end()` suitable for everything we need to do?
I removed as per our offline discussion.
- Benjamin
---
This is an
/path_tests.cpp 19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71878/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71878/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
d e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71852/#review218955
-------
On Dec. 6, 2019, 5:23 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an a
/mesos-tidy/entrypoint.sh 7d2225d8f75998ee13acf0bd57c9483dfc7acd98
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71852/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71852/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
Built a local image and tested it with a modified `support/mesos-tidy.sh`.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
.org/r/71833/#comment306913>
Is this outdated? I think we want to log whether we created a new file or
used an existing socket, and indicate whether we successfully did `bind` a
socket at that path.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Dec. 3, 2019
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71878/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71879/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
d4a73c34afb034ac35a3e305e603c61a03b99b5d
src/uri/fetchers/docker.cpp 1aa3def8362269e94c7f0bb05f9aa10049bf4af4
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71880/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
19dd910a534040468aeb48f15ebdf56dff32bc15
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71882/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
Do we need to include `cstdio`/`stdio.h` for `::strerror`?
- Benjamin Bannier
On Dec. 3, 2019, 7:32 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http
requests in non-SSL builds.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
7d2225d8f75998ee13acf0bd57c9483dfc7acd98
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71852/diff/1/
Testing
---
Built a local image and tested it with a modified `support/mesos-tidy.sh`.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71837/#review218824
---
Ship it!
LGTM.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 27, 2019, 4:18
` for socket returns `true`, for
a non-socket returns `false`).
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 27, 2019, 12:43 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
/r/71741/diff/2/?file=2174609#file2174609line1957>
> >
> > s/fall/for/
Sentence was removed.
- Benjamin
-------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/#review21
://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/diff/3/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/diff/2-3/
Testing
---
Previewed in generated site
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71787/#review218758
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 20, 2019, 3:49
: mesos
Description
---
Moved check on subscriber presences into subscribers.send.
Diffs
-
src/master/master.cpp 14b90a5e276df055bb8a570331f27cab200c9869
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71782/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
the potentially cleaned up
framework pointer anymore.
Diffs
-
src/master/master.cpp 14b90a5e276df055bb8a570331f27cab200c9869
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71781/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
://reviews.apache.org/r/71739/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71739/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
Previewed in generated site.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
6cc367dabf3bec507e8d49af54d9aad9ac17471c
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
Previewed in generated site
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
line
src/tests/persistent_volume_endpoints_tests.cpp
Lines 456-457 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/71787/#comment306582>
Let's get rid of one of these.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 20, 2019, 2:07
of
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71787/ which validates that a persistent volume
cannot be unreserved through `RESERVE_RESOURCES` calls.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 19, 2019, 5:52 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an auto
n
> ---
>
> Updated operator API documention to use rereservation format.
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> docs/operator-http-api.md 6cc367dabf3bec507e8d49af54d9aad9ac17471c
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71741/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
> Previewed in generated site
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Benjamin Bannier
>
>
,
Benjamin Bannier
---
Previewed in generated site
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
Previewed in generated site.
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
to
> > `collectauthorizations()`, even if the logic is sound it seems hard to
> > reason about.
> >
> > Would it be possible to eliminate the branching by setting `source` to
> > be `resources.popReservation()` if `source` is empty?
>
> Benjamin Bannier wrote
src/tests/master_authorization_tests.cpp
06471aa7779d399f4474ed40db3fbcc60b8298b2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71729/diff/3/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71729/diff/2-3/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
I'd prefer whatever formatting our
`clang-format` does, if only to remove the human element from this as much as
possible.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 6, 2019, 3:35 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically ge
that in for development repeatedly.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 5, 2019, 6:05 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
missed.
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71729/#review218545
---
On Nov. 7, 2019, n
src/tests/master_authorization_tests.cpp
06471aa7779d399f4474ed40db3fbcc60b8298b2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71729/diff/2/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71729/diff/1-2/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
> On Nov. 6, 2019, 5:03 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/exit.hpp
> > Line 65 (original), 65 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71734/diff/2/?file=2171707#file2171707line65>
> >
> > nit: single line?
>
> On Nov. 6, 2019, 5:03 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> > 3rdparty/stout/include/stout/attributes.hpp
> > Lines 17 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/71734/diff/2/?file=2171706#file2171706line17>
> >
> > Did you want to export this
mment306283>
nit: single line?
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 6, 2019, 4:56 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71695/
> -------
>
> (Updated Nov. 5, 2019, 2:25 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Bannier.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-9987 and MESOS-9989
> https://issues
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71695/#review218541
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 5, 2019, 2:25
5/#comment306272>
Line too long
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 6, 2019, 12:09 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
e0ed02900330c678bbf5c609c1f45d05147851ed
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71732/diff/1/
Testing
---
`make check`
Thanks,
Benjamin Bannier
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71719/#review218536
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 6, 2019, 12:06
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71700/#review218535
---
Ship it!
Patch looks great!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Oct. 29
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71696/#review218534
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 5, 2019, 2:25
at least add this to the declarations's
documentation.
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 5, 2019, 6:12 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://re
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71688/#review218532
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 1, 2019, 5:01
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/71687/#comment306268>
`error.isNone()`
- Benjamin Bannier
On Nov. 1, 2019, 4:59 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
1 - 100 of 3471 matches
Mail list logo