Re: Review Request 37315: Added basic authentication documentation

2015-08-11 Thread Tim Anderegg
/37315/diff/ Testing --- Ran git hook to validate formatting. Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 37315: Added basic authentication documentation

2015-08-11 Thread Tim Anderegg
On Aug. 10, 2015, 9:33 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: Thanks for doing this. Looking pretty good, just some minor comments. Tim Anderegg wrote: Thanks for taking the time to review, Vinod. I'll make those changes tomorrow. OK, submitted a revision. I'm not sure why the Mesos bot build

Re: Review Request 37315: Added basic authentication documentation

2015-08-11 Thread Tim Anderegg
. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37315/#review95018 --- On Aug. 11, 2015, 10:10 p.m., Tim Anderegg wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Review Request 37315: Added basic authentication documentation

2015-08-10 Thread Tim Anderegg
/browse/MESOS-1838 Repository: mesos Description --- Added basic authentication documentation Diffs - docs/authentication.md PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37315/diff/ Testing --- Ran git hook to validate formatting. Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 37315: Added basic authentication documentation

2015-08-10 Thread Tim Anderegg
generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37315/#review94799 --- On Aug. 10, 2015, 9 p.m., Tim Anderegg wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail

Re: Review Request 44441: Treated command as executable value and arguments in mesos-execute.

2016-04-07 Thread Tim Anderegg
> On April 4, 2016, 6:13 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote: > > src/cli/execute.cpp, line 287 > > > > > > This is incorrect. We handle this merging operation in runtime isolator. I was testing out a similar implementation

Re: Review Request 46469: Added support for credentials to mesos-execute.

2016-04-22 Thread Tim Anderegg
incipal even when not using authentication. - Tim --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46469/#review130012 -------

Re: Review Request 46469: Added support for credentials to mesos-execute.

2016-04-22 Thread Tim Anderegg
'auth_test' to agent '9edb64fe-5b97-43d3-81fe-81f0cdcea0b4-S0' Received status update TASK_RUNNING for task 'auth_test' source: SOURCE_EXECUTOR Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 47499: Make Mesos site responsive.

2016-05-17 Thread Tim Anderegg
columns on mobile devices to maximize vertical space, but that's probably a separate commit. - Tim Anderegg On May 18, 2016, 12:24 a.m., Tomasz Janiszewski wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep

Re: Review Request 47510: Adjusted style to make website mobile friendly.

2016-05-18 Thread Tim Anderegg
gt; > (Updated May 18, 2016, 6:04 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Freddy Ayuso-Henson, Tomasz Janiszewski, Tim > Anderegg, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3690 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3690 > > > Repository: mesos > > >

Review Request 46469: Added support for credentials to mesos-execute.

2016-04-20 Thread Tim Anderegg
ceived status update TASK_RUNNING for task 'auth_test' source: SOURCE_EXECUTOR Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-09-19 Thread Tim Anderegg
version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-09-19 Thread Tim Anderegg
e manually to verify that the documentation was built for each version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-09-28 Thread Tim Anderegg
rated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/#review150673 --- On Sept. 19, 2016, 8:43 p.m., Tim Anderegg wrote: > > --- > This is an automatic

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-09-28 Thread Tim Anderegg
e lines, or I could just remove it as this is probably an edge case anyways. - Tim ------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/#review150674 ---

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-12-12 Thread Tim Anderegg
/get_started/index.html > > * we list all available version in a separate page. Like what spark > > document do. http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html > > Tim Anderegg wrote: > I originally had the version in the left panel, but it seemed a bit > aw

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2016-12-12 Thread Tim Anderegg
to verify that the documentation was built for each version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-09 Thread Tim Anderegg
-- On May 5, 2017, 9:23 p.m., Tim Anderegg wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/ > ---

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-05 Thread Tim Anderegg
n was built for each version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-05 Thread Tim Anderegg
> On Dec. 23, 2016, 5:38 p.m., haosdent huang wrote: > > site/Rakefile > > Lines 122 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/diff/2/?file=1582226#file1582226line154> > > > > Replace all `\/latest\/` looks a bit dangerous. Do you have an e

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-05 Thread Tim Anderegg
of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-05 Thread Tim Anderegg
--- Testing was done manually to verify that the documentation was built for each version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-04 Thread Tim Anderegg
017, 9:26 p.m., Tim Anderegg wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/ > --- > >

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-05-04 Thread Tim Anderegg
/layouts/gettingstarted.erb PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/diff/2/ Testing --- Testing was done manually to verify that the documentation was built for each version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2017-09-12 Thread Tim Anderegg
> On May 9, 2017, 4:30 p.m., haosdent huang wrote: > > Hi, @tim Thanks a lot for your update. I am still reading you patch and > > have not finished. Could return my comments if it works at my side. Thanks > > a lot for your contributions. > > Tim Anderegg wr

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2018-02-08 Thread Tim Anderegg
(some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2018-02-12 Thread Tim Anderegg
any documentation at all). - Tim --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/#review197173 --- On Feb. 9, 2018, 1:46 a.m., Tim A

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2018-02-13 Thread Tim Anderegg
h version of Mesos that is supported (some older versions do not have compatible documentation). Thanks, Tim Anderegg

Re: Review Request 52064: Support for multiple versions of docs.

2018-02-24 Thread Tim Anderegg
(one for each tagged version), which would be GB's in size. Thanks! I should be able to find time to do this over the next week or so. Tim - Tim --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52064/#review198236 --