> On June 15, 2015, 12:07 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > Hey Robert; BenH helped out and wrote a PoC patch here
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/35405
> >
> > In short; it is not safe to delete the detector at this point. The patch
> > above does it in join() and has a good descriptive block
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33208/#review87958
---
Hey Robert; BenH helped out and wrote a PoC patch here
https://revi
> On April 20, 2015, 5:55 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > LGTM, barring a question about ordering/synchronization. I'll let another
> > committer take a look before we commit it.
>
> Adam B wrote:
> Would also like to see a successful ReviewBot pass. That MasterFailover
> segfault seems like it co
> On April 19, 2015, 10:55 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> > LGTM, barring a question about ordering/synchronization. I'll let another
> > committer take a look before we commit it.
>
> Adam B wrote:
> Would also like to see a successful ReviewBot pass. That MasterFailover
> segfault seems like it c
> On April 19, 2015, 10:55 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> > LGTM, barring a question about ordering/synchronization. I'll let another
> > committer take a look before we commit it.
>
> Adam B wrote:
> Would also like to see a successful ReviewBot pass. That MasterFailover
> segfault seems like it c
> On April 19, 2015, 10:55 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> > LGTM, barring a question about ordering/synchronization. I'll let another
> > committer take a look before we commit it.
>
> Adam B wrote:
> Would also like to see a successful ReviewBot pass. That MasterFailover
> segfault seems like it c
