---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/#review141466
---
Closing this review due to inactivity. Please see our
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/#review91145
---
src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/appc/hash.hpp (line 40)
On July 9, 2015, 6:47 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
Also, we need tests!?
- Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/#review91145
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/
---
(Updated July 7, 2015, 12:42 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Chi Zhang, Paul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/#review90791
---
1. Agree that this is useful as a utility in libprocess. Not much
On July 7, 2015, 3:56 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
1. Agree that this is useful as a utility in libprocess. Not much overhead
to move it over right?
2. It feels like something that could be exposed as a function rather than
class, maybe a TODO.
OK I realized that doing the
On May 18, 2015, 4:37 p.m., Chi Zhang wrote:
push the implementation down to stout?
is it possible to swap to use devel packages for hashing in the future?
Not to stout because it's asynchronous but perhaps to libprocess.
- Ian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34138/#review84195
---
push the implementation down to stout?
is it possible to swap to
