> On Jan. 7, 2017, 12:28 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > LGTM. Have you run any tests where the existing `CHECK_SOME` would fail and
> > the new code will behave properly? It might be worth running it at least
> > for one test. Maybe, in one of the containerizer value, just set it to
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55269/
---
(Updated Jan. 10, 2017, 2:19 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Kapil Arya.
> On Jan. 7, 2017, 12:28 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > LGTM. Have you run any tests where the existing `CHECK_SOME` would fail and
> > the new code will behave properly? It might be worth running it at least
> > for one test. Maybe, in one of the containerizer value, just set it to
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55269/#review160788
---
LGTM. Have you run any tests where the existing `CHECK_SOME`
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55269/#review160728
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [55268, 55269]
Passed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55269/
---
Review request for mesos and Kapil Arya.
Bugs: MESOS-6860
