---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/#review213669
---
FAIL: Failed to apply the current review.
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/#review213233
---
Bad review!
Reviews applied: [66746]
Error:
2019-02-26 21:33:43
> On April 24, 2018, 12:43 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > I'm not sure this approach is tenable, we may in the future have two
> > different `foo` fields with differing equality semantics.
> >
> > I was expecting that this patch would add an equality operator for specific
> > types we want
> On April 23, 2018, 8:43 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > I'm not sure this approach is tenable, we may in the future have two
> > different `foo` fields with differing equality semantics.
> >
> > I was expecting that this patch would add an equality operator for specific
> > types we want
> On April 23, 2018, 8:43 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > I'm not sure this approach is tenable, we may in the future have two
> > different `foo` fields with differing equality semantics.
> >
> > I was expecting that this patch would add an equality operator for specific
> > types we want
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/#review201799
---
I'm not sure this approach is tenable, we may in the future have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Till Toenshoff.
Repository: