Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
I know why tests fail - please see my comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82909980
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -105,11 +105,21 @@ class StreamExecution(
var
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82910246
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user olarayej commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82910308
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2836,7 +2845,11 @@ setMethod("lpad", signature(x = "Column", len =
"numeric", pad = "character"),
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82910318
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82910187
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -56,7 +57,12 @@ case class StateStoreRestoreExec(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
It's interesting AppVeyor is not running for this PR even though there are
R changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #66773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66773/consoleFull)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
**[Test build #66770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66770/consoleFull)**
for PR 15338 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66771/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66772/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82911304
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2836,7 +2845,11 @@ setMethod("lpad", signature(x = "Column", len =
"numeric", pad = "character"),
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
@srowen Since this is happening 'below' the user code (in the hadoop rdd),
is there a way around how to handle this ?
I agree that for a lot of usecases where it is critical to work off the
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
I think some of the old tests still rely on `sparkRSQL.init()`. I believe
the warning is OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66765/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #66766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66766/consoleFull)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82897143
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache License,
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
@felixcheung does it look OK now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82903865
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache License,
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
**[Test build #66759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66759/consoleFull)**
for PR 15338 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82907977
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1168,12 +1179,14 @@ setMethod("take",
#' Head
#'
-#' Return the first \code{num} rows of a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908439
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -32,35 +34,65 @@ setOldClass("jobj")
#' @export
#' @note Column since 1.4.0
setClass("Column",
-
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66767/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66767/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
Github user mikejihbe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
Thanks for the review @srowen. Those changes are in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12524
@seayi any progress on this ? Would be good to add this in if consistently
reproducible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932068
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/Predictor.scala ---
@@ -121,10 +122,18 @@ abstract class Predictor[
* and put it in an RDD with
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82935295
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932894
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82932799
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610
This problem should be handled by
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394 if it is merged. It seems this is no
longer active, and we are pursuing alternative solutions. Shall we close this?
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82937473
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15406
We should add weights to the doctests to demonstrate them and make sure
they're working.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
@marmbrus Could you take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434
Just FYI. Hive allows the following changes:
```SQL
ALTER TABLE db1.tbl RENAME TO db2.tbl2
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15434#discussion_r82938529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -459,11 +459,20 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82938410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15440
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15439
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66790/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414#discussion_r82931901
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/PredictorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008
@rotationsymmetry Could you please close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
@falaki @felixcheung The DirectKafkaStreamSuite is a known flaky test.
Nothing in this patch should affect Kafka.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r82937255
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +208,7 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15440
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15427
**[Test build #66790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66790/consoleFull)**
for PR 15427 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15173
@zsxwing Why was not this merge to 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15230#discussion_r82940270
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ case class AlterTableSetPropertiesCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66792/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
**[Test build #66794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/consoleFull)**
for PR 9766 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66794/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66789/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66792/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
GitHub user apivovarov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
[SPARK-14804][Graphx] Graph vertexRDD/EdgeRDD checkpoint results Clasâ¦
EdgeRDD/VertexRDD wraps partitionsRDD
e.g. `EdgeRDDImpl.checkpoint()` calls `partitionsRDD.checkpoint()`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15445
**[Test build #66789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66789/consoleFull)**
for PR 15445 at commit
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421#discussion_r82940884
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/SerDe.scala ---
@@ -125,15 +125,34 @@ private[spark] object SerDe {
}
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user apivovarov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15447
Related PRs
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15396
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338#discussion_r82871978
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -122,6 +123,35 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
export SPARK_NICENESS=0
fi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338#discussion_r82872476
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -122,6 +123,35 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
export SPARK_NICENESS=0
fi
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338#discussion_r82874084
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -146,13 +176,11 @@ run_command() {
case "$mode" in
(class)
- nohup nice -n
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338#discussion_r82875044
--- Diff: sbin/spark-daemon.sh ---
@@ -122,6 +123,35 @@ if [ "$SPARK_NICENESS" = "" ]; then
export SPARK_NICENESS=0
fi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66757 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66757/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66757/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13194#discussion_r82877590
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/evaluation.py ---
@@ -311,19 +330,25 @@ def setParams(self, predictionCol="prediction",
labelCol="label",
if
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
[SPARK-17845][SQL] More self-evident window function frame boundary API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
**[Test build #66754 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66754/consoleFull)**
for PR 15437 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66754/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
cc @tdas @zsxwing Would one of you want to look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #66756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66756/consoleFull)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766#discussion_r82876419
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -202,6 +202,26 @@ def registerFunction(self, name, f,
returnType=StringType()):
"""
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766#discussion_r82876509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -17,9 +17,15 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
+
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766#discussion_r82876442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +419,63 @@ class UDFRegistration private[sql] (functionRegistry:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66757 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66757/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
**[Test build #66752 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66752/consoleFull)**
for PR 15436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user neggert commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12576
Not sure what's going on regarding the multiple PRs for this issue, but I
cherry-picked this PR on top of 1.6.2 and it fixed the problem for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66756/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766#discussion_r82876529
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +419,63 @@ class UDFRegistration private[sql] (functionRegistry:
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15410
Just to raise an idea that would possibly mean less code change, would
simply having a flag that causing a "currently processing applications" type
message to display without an actual count with
401 - 500 of 661 matches
Mail list logo
