Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67269/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
**[Test build #67269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67269/consoleFull)**
for PR 15569 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67274/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567#discussion_r84333445
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -274,12 +274,12 @@ trait Nondeterministic extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567#discussion_r84333278
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -787,14 +787,26 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
- *
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569#discussion_r84332975
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ case class CatalogTablePartition(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mateiz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12913
@techaddict Cool, thanks! Just remembered a couple more things:
- Can you edit KryoSerializerSuite to set the flag to false? Otherwise we
might silently end up with both suites testing on true if
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
Alright merging in master. Thanks.
@koertkuipers would you be able to add the optimizer rule?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67268/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
**[Test build #67273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67273/consoleFull)**
for PR 15562 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
**[Test build #67268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13526 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
**[Test build #67272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67272/consoleFull)**
for PR 15433 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
cc @srinathshankar
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272#discussion_r84328352
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -408,6 +467,25 @@ class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
Merged in master.
@tejasapatil can you create a backport for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
Actually let me just merge it. I will fix this in my other pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569#discussion_r84324810
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ case class CatalogTablePartition(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #67271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67271/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15556
That's right, it still reads the whole file but skips posting most of it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67270/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67266/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67266/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67267/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
**[Test build #67267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67267/consoleFull)**
for PR 15433 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
@cloud-fan @viirya Thank you very much !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
**[Test build #67269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67269/consoleFull)**
for PR 15569 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
cc @ericl @mallman @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15569
[SPARK-18029][SQL] PruneFileSourcePartitions should not change the output
of LogicalRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `PruneFileSourcePartitions`, we will
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15556
So this is still reading the entire file, its just filtering out just the
start and end log entries? so basically the listener bus only replays those
events vs all of them.
Have you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15557
**[Test build #3367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3367/consoleFull)**
for PR 15557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
**[Test build #67268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13526 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r84299435
--- Diff:
mesos/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArgumentsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r84299382
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -412,10 +412,9 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r84299319
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CommandLineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
@vanzin ok I will update the PR asap.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r84297878
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/CommandLineUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
I haven't looked through the code in detail but can you clarify the design
a bit on this, the design pretty much just says we are splitting up the fetch
of the map outputs but it doesn't say what
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
**[Test build #67267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67267/consoleFull)**
for PR 15433 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67266/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
@hvanhovell Now HyperLogLogPlusPlus is kept as an ImperativeAggregate and
the algorithm is separated from it. I also modify the newly added
IntervalDistinctApprox as an ImperativeAggregate too.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67255/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
**[Test build #67255 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67255/consoleFull)**
for PR 15436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67265/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67265/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
cc @ericl @mallman @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
**[Test build #67265 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67265/consoleFull)**
for PR 15568 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67262/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67263/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
**[Test build #67263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67263/consoleFull)**
for PR 15433 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15568
[SPARK-18028][SQL] simplify TableFileCatalog
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Simplify/cleanup TableFileCatalog:
1. pass a `CatalogTable` instead of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67262/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
Well, heck. This all works fine except with Python 3.x tests. I don't know
why yet. Still debugging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15557
**[Test build #3367 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3367/consoleFull)**
for PR 15557 at commit
Github user robert3005 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14615
@rxin any chance you or someone else can take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15376#discussion_r84271330
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -246,7 +247,27 @@ case class LoadDataCommand(
val
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15272#discussion_r84269182
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedReadSuite.scala ---
@@ -408,6 +467,25 @@ class BucketedReadSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67264/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
**[Test build #67264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67264/consoleFull)**
for PR 13526 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
**[Test build #67264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67264/consoleFull)**
for PR 13526 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15556#discussion_r84267482
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ReplayListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -43,38 +43,56 @@ private[spark] class ReplayListenerBus
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
it lacks an optimizer rule to collapse `AppendColumns`, but seems ok to
merge it first and add the rule in follow-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67260/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67260/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67257/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67257/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
it's fine, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67254/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
**[Test build #67263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67263/consoleFull)**
for PR 15433 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15566
**[Test build #67254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67254/consoleFull)**
for PR 15566 at commit
Github user vijoshi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15556#discussion_r84261940
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ReplayListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -43,19 +43,25 @@ private[spark] class ReplayListenerBus extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
**[Test build #67261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67261/consoleFull)**
for PR 15212 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15564
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15564
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67250/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15564
**[Test build #67250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67250/consoleFull)**
for PR 15564 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15526
cc @srowen @MLnick @jkbradley @rxin Could you add @drewrobb to whitelist? I
can not trigger the Jenkins job. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67262/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15565
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15565
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67251/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15565
**[Test build #67251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67251/consoleFull)**
for PR 15565 at commit
401 - 500 of 633 matches
Mail list logo
