Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64526546
[Test build #23884 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23884/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64527790
[Test build #23886 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23886/consoleFull)
for PR 3462 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#discussion_r20921760
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +261,57 @@ object Vectors {
sys.error(Unsupported Breeze
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#discussion_r20921781
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +261,57 @@ object Vectors {
sys.error(Unsupported Breeze
GitHub user maji2014 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3475
[SPARK-4619][Storage]delete redundant time suffix
Time suffix exists in Utils.getUsedTimeMs(startTime), no need to append
again, delete that
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#discussion_r20921838
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +261,57 @@ object Vectors {
sys.error(Unsupported Breeze
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3475#issuecomment-64530371
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#discussion_r20921892
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +261,57 @@ object Vectors {
sys.error(Unsupported Breeze
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#discussion_r20921916
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -261,6 +261,57 @@ object Vectors {
sys.error(Unsupported Breeze
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3472#issuecomment-64532086
Merging in master branch-1.2. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64532440
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64532433
[Test build #23881 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23881/consoleFull)
for PR 3462 at commit
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3476
[SPARK-4620] Add unpersist in Graph and GraphImpl
Add an IF to uncache both vertices and edges of Graph/GraphImpl.
This IF is useful when iterative graph operations build a new graph in each
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3476#issuecomment-64532938
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473#issuecomment-64534413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473#issuecomment-64534404
[Test build #23882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23882/consoleFull)
for PR 3473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64535783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64535777
[Test build #23885 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23885/consoleFull)
for PR 3462 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3411
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3465
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3459
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64536426
[Test build #23884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23884/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3463
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3472
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64536497
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3340
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3447
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64537183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3462#issuecomment-64537174
[Test build #23886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23886/consoleFull)
for PR 3462 at commit
Github user maasg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3466#discussion_r20924293
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingSource.scala ---
@@ -70,4 +78,14 @@ private[streaming] class StreamingSource(ssc:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#discussion_r20924923
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1242,6 +1242,25 @@
/profile
+profile
+ iddoclint-java8-disable/id
+ activation
+
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3405#issuecomment-64539308
I think we should add @ueshin 's patch at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058 which should properly disable javadoc
8 missing javadoc warnings anyway. I think this
GitHub user tsingfu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3477
[SparkSQL][SPARK-4528] add comment support for Spark SQL CLI spark-sql
while using *spark-sql*, found it does not support comment while write
sqls.
**Comment support** is widely using in many
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3477#issuecomment-64541553
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3478#issuecomment-64545160
[Test build #23888 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23888/consoleFull)
for PR 3478 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#discussion_r20927574
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1242,6 +1242,25 @@
/profile
+profile
+ iddoclint-java8-disable/id
+ activation
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-64546025
[Test build #23889 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23889/consoleFull)
for PR 3058 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64547142
[Test build #23890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23890/consoleFull)
for PR 3474 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473#issuecomment-64547174
[Test build #23891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23891/consoleFull)
for PR 3473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3478#issuecomment-64579267
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3478#issuecomment-64579183
[Test build #23888 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23888/consoleFull)
for PR 3478 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3464#issuecomment-64581017
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3464#issuecomment-64580965
[Test build #23887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23887/consoleFull)
for PR 3464 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-64596000
[Test build #23889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23889/consoleFull)
for PR 3058 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-64596006
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3466#discussion_r20931831
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingSource.scala ---
@@ -70,4 +78,14 @@ private[streaming] class StreamingSource(ssc:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64596891
[Test build #23890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23890/consoleFull)
for PR 3474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64596901
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3466#discussion_r20932324
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingSource.scala ---
@@ -70,4 +78,14 @@ private[streaming] class StreamingSource(ssc:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473#issuecomment-64598815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473#issuecomment-64598806
[Test build #23891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23891/consoleFull)
for PR 3473 at commit
GitHub user SaintBacchus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3479
[SPARK-4623]Add the some error infomation if using spark-sql in
yarn-cluster mode
If using spark-sql in yarn-cluster mode, print an error infomation just as
the spark shell in yarn-cluster
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3479#issuecomment-64599810
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3467#issuecomment-64601739
[Test build #23892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23892/consoleFull)
for PR 3467 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64603187
[Test build #23893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23893/consoleFull)
for PR 2524 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3480
SPARK-2192 [BUILD] Examples Data Not in Binary Distribution
Simply, add data/ to distributions. This adds about 291KB (compressed) to
the tarball, FYI.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3480#issuecomment-64608592
[Test build #23894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23894/consoleFull)
for PR 3480 at commit
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3479#discussion_r20936956
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ object SparkSubmit {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3467#issuecomment-64653027
[Test build #23892 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23892/consoleFull)
for PR 3467 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3467#issuecomment-64653042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SaintBacchus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3479#discussion_r20937437
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ object SparkSubmit {
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3471#issuecomment-64653209
Why we need a `val waitTime = 100`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3459#discussion_r20937749
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
---
@@ -28,13 +28,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64654772
[Test build #23893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23893/consoleFull)
for PR 2524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64654780
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64655766
Hey, @mateiz , thank you very much for the review,
I addressed all of them except the lastId one, as MIMA wants me to keep
that since it's public.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64655857
[Test build #23895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23895/consoleFull)
for PR 2524 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3480#issuecomment-64657490
[Test build #23894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23894/consoleFull)
for PR 3480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3480#issuecomment-64657504
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3481
[SPARK-4625] [SQL] Add sort by for DSL SimpleSqlParser
Add `sort by` support for both DSL SqlParser.
This PR is relevant with #3386, once either one merged, the other need to
be
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3481#issuecomment-64659416
[Test build #23896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23896/consoleFull)
for PR 3481 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3463#issuecomment-64659830
Just an addition note. This issue was caught by @jl982. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3478#issuecomment-64665984
@liancheng this appears to have failed its own test :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64668708
[Test build #23895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23895/consoleFull)
for PR 2524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-64668716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3481#issuecomment-64669806
[Test build #23896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23896/consoleFull)
for PR 3481 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3481#issuecomment-64669816
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64670254
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64671010
[Test build #23897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23897/consoleFull)
for PR 3474 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64671123
@brkyvz Thanks! I've merged this into master. Will submit another PR for
branch-1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3482
[BRANCH-1.2][SPARK-4614][MLLIB] Slight API changes in Matrix and Matrices
This is #3468 for branch-1.2, same content except mima excludes.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user mengxr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3473
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3482#issuecomment-64672216
[Test build #23898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23898/consoleFull)
for PR 3482 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-64673009
[Test build #23899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23899/consoleFull)
for PR 3150 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3478#issuecomment-64675566
@pwendell Yea, I don't see why it can't find Derby driver, and I can't
reproduce it locally :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3319#issuecomment-64681676
[Test build #23900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23900/consoleFull)
for PR 3319 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-64682672
[Test build #23899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23899/consoleFull)
for PR 3150 at commit
GitHub user roxchkplusony opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3483
[SPARK-4626] Kill a task only if the executorId is (still) registered with
the scheduler
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-64682678
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64682826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64682818
[Test build #23897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23897/consoleFull)
for PR 3474 at commit
Github user roxchkplusony commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3483#issuecomment-64683263
I largely stole the structure from the status update message handler.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3483#issuecomment-64683431
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3474#issuecomment-64683872
@tdas I saw this test also failed in branch-1.2:
org.apache.spark.streaming.CheckpointSuite.recovery with file input stream
test this please
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3482#issuecomment-64688375
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3482#issuecomment-64688366
[Test build #23898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23898/consoleFull)
for PR 3482 at commit
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
