Github user sadhen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
OK, I will modify the PR several hours later.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240110126
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23270
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99896/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
**[Test build #99896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99896/testReport)**
for PR 23269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23270
**[Test build #99897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99897/testReport)**
for PR 23270 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23270
[SPARK-26317][BUILD] Upgrade SBT to 0.13.18
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SBT 0.13.14 ~ 1.1.1 has a bug on accessing `java.util.Base64.getDecoder` on
JDK9+.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240107064
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user maomaoChibei commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240107003
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23132
`spark.sql.legacy.decimalParsing.enabled` is still shown in the PR
description and commit messages.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240105070
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23124#discussion_r240104815
--- Diff: docs/sql-migration-guide-upgrade.md ---
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ displayTitle: Spark SQL Upgrading Guide
- In Spark version 2.4 and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204#discussion_r240104812
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashJoin.scala ---
@@ -213,10 +213,6 @@ trait HashJoin {
Github user wangjiaochun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225#discussion_r239990587
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleExternalSorter.java ---
@@ -161,6 +161,10 @@ private void writeSortedFile(boolean
Github user wangjiaochun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225#discussion_r239990083
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriterSuite.java
---
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ public void writeEmptyIterator()
Github user sadhen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240103941
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This function
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18784
Looks inactive. @srowen and @felixcheung, do you know anyone who might be
interested in this?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
@JkSelf . Since PR description already mentioned the background and the
partital revert stuff, could you update the PR title to describe your solution
more directly? `partial revert` doesn't
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240101927
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
Yup, the test looks okay in that way. Let's file a JIRA and only leave the
test case.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
**[Test build #99896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99896/testReport)**
for PR 23269 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23208#discussion_r240101369
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2Relation.scala
---
@@ -17,52 +17,49 @@
Github user JkSelf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
@cloud-fan the new ticket is in
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269 ). I will close this ticket.
---
-
To
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
The existing way is too JAVA.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
**[Test build #99894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99894/testReport)**
for PR 23204 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99894/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sadhen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
Nevermind, just do not like the coding style personally.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user JkSelf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23269
partial revert 21052 because of the performance degradation in TPC-DS
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We tested TPC-DS in spark2.3 with and without
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
thanks, merging to master/2.4/2.3!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user sadhen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240098806
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This function
Github user sadhen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240098620
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This function
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
@sadhen What is the motivation of this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
Let's close this one.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240097931
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211
to make the PR smaller, can we add an individual rule
`PushdownLeftSemiOrAntiJoin` first?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211#discussion_r240097479
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -984,6 +1002,28 @@ object PushDownPredicate extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
**[Test build #99895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99895/testReport)**
for PR 23268 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211#discussion_r240097255
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -649,13 +664,16 @@ object CollapseProject extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225
Thank you, @wangjiaochun .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268#discussion_r240097105
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveShim.scala
---
@@ -53,19 +53,12 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
* This
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99891/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
**[Test build #99891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99891/testReport)**
for PR 23255 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
can we follow
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204#issuecomment-445510026 and create a
new ticket?
---
-
To
GitHub user sadhen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23268
[Hive][Minor] Refactor on HiveShim and Add Unit Tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor on HiveShim, and add Unit Tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22290
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user LuciferYang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
ok~ already close #23214
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user LuciferYang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23214
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user LuciferYang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23214
As @cloud-fan said `the hash join metrics is wrongly implemented`, we will
partial revert # SPARK-21052, no longer need this patch, close it ~
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99890/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user JkSelf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
@cloud-fan @dongjoon-hyun update the patch, please help review if you have
time. Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23225
**[Test build #99890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99890/testReport)**
for PR 23225 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
**[Test build #99894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99894/testReport)**
for PR 23204 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23211#discussion_r240092936
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -267,6 +267,17 @@ object ScalarSubquery {
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22305#discussion_r240092271
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/WindowInPandasExec.scala
---
@@ -144,24 +282,107 @@ case class WindowInPandasExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99893/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
**[Test build #99893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99893/testReport)**
for PR 21877 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23248
If it's fine for 2.4, I think it's also fine for master as a temporary fix?
We can create another ticket to clean up the subquery optimization hack. IIUC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21877
**[Test build #99893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99893/testReport)**
for PR 21877 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23258#discussion_r240090371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -182,10 +182,13 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23201#discussion_r240090192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JsonInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -121,7 +122,26 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23228
**[Test build #99892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99892/testReport)**
for PR 23228 at commit
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23265
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23228
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
If we can quickly finish #23214 (within several days), let's go for it. But
if we can't, I'd suggest we do the partial revert first to fix the perf
regression, and add back the metrics later.
Github user LuciferYang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23204
@cloud-fan If we decide to partial revert SPARK-21052 and no need for
#23214, I will close it.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23255
**[Test build #99891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99891/testReport)**
for PR 23255 at commit
Github user Ngone51 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23223
Hi @tgravescs , I tried it, but found it's difficult to produce
KILLED_BY_RESOURCEMANAGER exit status. I followed
[YARN-73](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-73)
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23248
LGTM to the surgical fix for backporting.
We need to fix this rule with the other rules for avoiding making such a
strong and hidden assumption.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23248#discussion_r240079120
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -131,8 +131,20 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFs
Github user fjh100456 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22707#discussion_r240077883
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -774,4 +774,23 @@ class InsertSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23266#discussion_r240074711
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/SupportsBatchRead.java
---
@@ -20,14 +20,27 @@
import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23266#discussion_r240073831
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/SupportsBatchRead.java
---
@@ -20,14 +20,27 @@
import
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22707#discussion_r240073151
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -774,4 +774,23 @@ class InsertSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23072
It looks enough to me, @srowen .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16812
I still don't think need this since the workaround is easy. If other
committers find it worth, I won't object.
If there are no interests fro this PR afterwards, I would just close this.
Github user fjh100456 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22707#discussion_r240070378
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -227,18 +227,22 @@ case class
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23228
I have updated, thanks all.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23267
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
