---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37764/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 10:38 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/#review96377
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Zameer Manji
On Aug. 25, 2015, 8:01 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/#review96362
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Aug. 25, 2015, 3:01
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37764/
---
Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
Bugs: AURORA-851
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37764/#review96374
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Aug. 25, 2015, 5:38
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/
---
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Zameer Manji.
Bugs:
On Aug. 25, 2015, 3:31 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/http/http_example.aurora, lines 45-48
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37742/diff/1/?file=1049818#file1049818line45
I am a bit concerned we will no longer have any constraint coverage in
our e2e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 9:38 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora and Maxim
On Aug. 25, 2015, 4:12 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
specs/rpm/Makefile, lines 37-38
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/diff/1/?file=1052463#file1052463line37
This is weird as a user will never be able to upgrade from a release
version to a nightly.
Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96494
---
Ship it!
specs/rpm/aurora.spec (lines 62 - 72)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37788/
---
Review request for Aurora and Kevin Sweeney.
Repository: aurora-packaging
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/#review96399
---
Master (86a547b) is green with this patch.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/#review96394
---
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37719/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 10:28 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and
On Aug. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't reflect
the change made in this instance event? Do we care?
I don't think we care, there's not much we can do in that case, is there? The
only thing I can think of is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37770/#review96420
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On Aug. 25, 2015, 1:16 p.m.,
On Aug. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't reflect
the change made in this instance event? Do we care?
Joshua Cohen wrote:
I don't think we care, there's not much we can do in that case, is there?
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37776/#review96459
---
Ship it!
Master (96a086c) is green with this patch.
On Aug. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't reflect
the change made in this instance event? Do we care?
Joshua Cohen wrote:
I don't think we care, there's not much we can do in that case, is there?
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37774/#review96439
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On Aug. 25, 2015, 3:16 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96443
---
specs/rpm/Makefile (lines 37 - 38)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/#review96450
---
specs/rpm/Makefile (line 33)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37719/#review96438
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On Aug. 25, 2015, 3:28 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37776/
---
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Zameer Manji.
Repository: aurora
On Aug. 25, 2015, 11:12 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
specs/rpm/Makefile, lines 37-38
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/diff/1/?file=1052463#file1052463line37
This is weird as a user will never be able to upgrade from a release
version to a nightly.
Isn't version global across RPM
On Aug. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't reflect
the change made in this instance event? Do we care?
Joshua Cohen wrote:
I don't think we care, there's not much we can do in that case, is there?
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37772/
---
Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
Bugs: AURORA-851
On Aug. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
What if they click on an old update and the instance page doesn't reflect
the change made in this instance event? Do we care?
Joshua Cohen wrote:
I don't think we care, there's not much we can do in that case, is there?
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37761/#review96479
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David McLaughlin
On Aug. 25, 2015, 3:01
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37776/#review96480
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On Aug. 25, 2015, 4:05 p.m.,
30 matches
Mail list logo
