> On July 7, 2016, 12:41 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > Pushed this as tbr to origin/0.15.x in favor of speeding up the vote.
> > Feedback is still welcome.
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Shouldn't this be on master? I discarded my similar fix here after
> having missed this was only on a
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 4:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
> On July 7, 2016, 2:33 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > I am slightly worried the tests only seem to work after this change ...
> > IIUC Aurora 0.15.0 should work with mesos 0.27.2 (Aurora should work with
> > the mesos its developed against +/- 1).
>
> John Sirois wrote:
> Oh, now I
