> On Aug. 3, 2016, 3:58 a.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > So, on further reflection, it doesn't necessarily make sense for the
> > response type to be dictated by the `Content-Type` of the request. We
> > should probably use the `Accept` header instead? I don't necessarily know
> > if the use case
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47853/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 3:34 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Jie Yu, Maxim Khut
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47853/#review144620
---
Ship it!
Master (b912e17) is green with this patch.
./build-s
> On Aug. 2, 2016, 7:36 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > I was about to push this change, but in the process of running e2e tests
> > locally after applying your patch, it occurs to me that perhaps this is
> > something we should have e2e coverage for.
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to
> On Aug. 3, 2016, 2:36 a.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > I was about to push this change, but in the process of running e2e tests
> > locally after applying your patch, it occurs to me that perhaps this is
> > something we should have e2e coverage for.
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to
> On Aug. 2, 2016, 6:58 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > So, on further reflection, it doesn't necessarily make sense for the
> > response type to be dictated by the `Content-Type` of the request. We
> > should probably use the `Accept` header instead? I don't necessarily know
> > if the use case
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50685/#review144653
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Dmitriy Shirchenko
On Aug. 3, 2016, 12:1
> On Aug. 2, 2016, 7:36 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > I was about to push this change, but in the process of running e2e tests
> > locally after applying your patch, it occurs to me that perhaps this is
> > something we should have e2e coverage for.
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to
> On Aug. 2, 2016, 7:36 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > I was about to push this change, but in the process of running e2e tests
> > locally after applying your patch, it occurs to me that perhaps this is
> > something we should have e2e coverage for.
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to
> On Aug. 3, 2016, 2:36 a.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > I was about to push this change, but in the process of running e2e tests
> > locally after applying your patch, it occurs to me that perhaps this is
> > something we should have e2e coverage for.
> >
> > Do you think it would be feasible to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50685/#review144666
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Stephan Erb
On Aug. 3, 2016, 2:10 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 8:47 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen, Maxi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/#review144669
---
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdateContro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/#review144674
---
Ship it!
Master (a071af3) is green with this patch.
./build-s
> On Aug. 2, 2016, 6:58 p.m., Joshua Cohen wrote:
> > So, on further reflection, it doesn't necessarily make sense for the
> > response type to be dictated by the `Content-Type` of the request. We
> > should probably use the `Accept` header instead? I don't necessarily know
> > if the use case
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50685/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 2:36 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen, Maxi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 9:51 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen, Maxi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/#review144678
---
Ship it!
Thanks for following up!
src/main/java/org/apache/au
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50480/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 3:01 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/
---
(Updated Aug. 3, 2016, 10:16 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen, Max
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50685/#review144685
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Cohen
On Aug. 3, 2016, 9:36 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50685/#review144688
---
Ship it!
Master (a071af3) is green with this patch.
./build-s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50168/#review144689
---
Ship it!
Master (a071af3) is green with this patch.
./build-s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50480/#review144693
---
Master (a071af3) is red with this patch.
./build-support/jenkins
24 matches
Mail list logo
