Re: Review Request 40249: [cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command

2015-11-12 Thread Aurora ReviewBot

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/#review106317
---


Master (b4102de) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

However, it appears that it might lack test coverage.

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Nov. 12, 2015, 7:46 p.m., Paul Cavallaro wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2015, 7:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> [cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py 
> 6dd9dec76a6cb2420469e4502ece60854b85155a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> ./pants binary src/main/python/apache/aurora/client:aurora
> ./dist/aurora.pex job inspect --help
> ./dist/aurora.pex job inspect 'ed a config and looked correct
> 
> 
> Didn't find any python_tests targets under the CLI [edit: incorrect]
> 
> EDIT:
> 
> Tested with:
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client:
> 
> Had failures in:
> src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_update.py
> 
> Ran just those tests, and passed again, so perhaps flaky?
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli:update [passes]
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Cavallaro
> 
>



Re: Review Request 40249: [cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Cavallaro

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/
---

(Updated Nov. 12, 2015, 7:46 p.m.)


Review request for Aurora.


Changes
---

Updated testing


Repository: aurora


Description
---

[cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command


Diffs
-

  src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py 
6dd9dec76a6cb2420469e4502ece60854b85155a 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/diff/


Testing (updated)
---

./pants binary src/main/python/apache/aurora/client:aurora
./dist/aurora.pex job inspect --help
./dist/aurora.pex job inspect 'ed a config and looked correct


Didn't find any python_tests targets under the CLI [edit: incorrect]

EDIT:

Tested with:
./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client:

Had failures in:
src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_update.py

Ran just those tests, and passed again, so perhaps flaky?
./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli:update [passes]


Thanks,

Paul Cavallaro



Re: Review Request 40249: [cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command

2015-11-12 Thread Bill Farner

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/#review106359
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Bill Farner


On Nov. 12, 2015, 11:46 a.m., Paul Cavallaro wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2015, 11:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> [cli] Remove unused --local flag to job inspect command
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py 
> 6dd9dec76a6cb2420469e4502ece60854b85155a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> ./pants binary src/main/python/apache/aurora/client:aurora
> ./dist/aurora.pex job inspect --help
> ./dist/aurora.pex job inspect 'ed a config and looked correct
> 
> 
> Didn't find any python_tests targets under the CLI [edit: incorrect]
> 
> EDIT:
> 
> Tested with:
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client:
> 
> Had failures in:
> src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_update.py
> 
> Ran just those tests, and passed again, so perhaps flaky?
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli:update [passes]
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul Cavallaro
> 
>