> On Jan. 22, 2016, 10:28 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 6:28 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 6:28 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 1:21 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, John Sirois and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/#review115943
---
Ship it!
Master (2da1700) is green with this patch.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/#review115936
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Jan. 22, 2016,
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 10:28 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/#review115932
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Sirois
On Jan. 22, 2016, 2:21
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 6:28 p.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 10:28 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/#review115892
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Sirois
On Jan. 22, 2016, 1:11 a.m.,
> On Jan. 22, 2016, 10:28 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to add schema
> > / data updates to a new aurora release such that they get applied after
> > recovering the log but before doing anything else? I guess its valid to
> > say
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/#review115888
---
The mechanics of the change lgtm, but is there some other way to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42646/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 12:11 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora, John Sirois and
14 matches
Mail list logo
