---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review118107
---
NEWS (line 6)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review119205
---
Impl looks good to me in general. Once tests are added, should be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review119157
---
@ReviewBot retry
- Bill Farner
On Feb. 12, 2016, 6:17 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review119132
---
Master (2b48f22) is red with this patch.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2016, 6:17 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/
---
(Updated Feb. 5, 2016, 2:57 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review118108
---
Ship it!
Master (a9e7a35) is green with this patch.
> On Feb. 4, 2016, 6:36 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
> > Adding explicit reviewers to the People field is the standard way of moving
> > an RB forward. As soon as your ready to have this looked at again, please
> > add reviewers and give the all clear.
Will do, thank you.
- Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review117814
---
Adding explicit reviewers to the People field is the standard way
> On Jan. 31, 2016, 3:29 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> > With the new proposed option we'd get `--execute-as-user`, `--nosetuid`,
> > and `--docker-setuid`. The last two are basically doing the same thing.
> >
> > Would it make sense to resolve this by pushing things up the stack and
> > allow
> On Feb. 1, 2016, 12:29 a.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> > With the new proposed option we'd get `--execute-as-user`, `--nosetuid`,
> > and `--docker-setuid`. The last two are basically doing the same thing.
> >
> > Would it make sense to resolve this by pushing things up the stack and
> > allow
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review117162
---
With the new proposed option we'd get `--execute-as-user`,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review117137
---
Tests for this are not written yet.
- Benjamin Staffin
On Jan.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43027/#review117139
---
Master (de0029b) is green with this patch.
14 matches
Mail list logo
